User talk:Chicdat
| This is Chicdat's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9Auto-archiving period: 14 days  |
Precious anniversary
[edit] | |
| Four years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:27, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you! It's been a hard last couple of months for me with everything that's been going on in America lately, so I appreciate the message. 🐔 Chicdat Bawk to me! 10:39, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
The Signpost: 22 March 2025
[edit]- From the editor: Hanami
- News and notes: Deeper look at takedowns targeting Wikipedia
- In the media: The good, the bad, and the unusual
- Recent research: Explaining the disappointing history of Flagged Revisions; and what's the impact of ChatGPT on Wikipedia so far?
- Traffic report: All the world's a stage, we are merely players...
- Gallery: WikiPortraits rule!
- Essay: Unusual biographical images
- Obituary: Rest in peace
Request For Comment - Infobox Weather Damage Estimates
[edit]There is a new ongoing request for comment discussion, with the goal to solve the various disputes on weather-related articles (such as tornadoes or hurricanees) on how to best utilize damage estimates in the infobox. Your comments are highly-requested, as the result of this discussion will affect all weather-related articles. This notice is being sent to all editors who have recently edited weather event articles.
You can view and participate in the discussion here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Weather#RFC - Weather Infobox Damages. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 17:23, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
Your comment here is an allegation of misconduct. If you wish to substantiate it, take it to ANI. An article TP is no place to make such an allegation and a WP:PERSONALATTACK without substantiation. I suggest you strike that part of your comment. Cinderella157 (talk) 11:36, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Tendentious editing is a pattern of editing that is partisan, biased, skewed...
I beg you to substantiate how you have not acted in that manner in these RMs. I see no examples of your !voting for a lowercase page name to be moved to uppercase. A personal attack is an attack against that editor personally, e.g. You are an idiot. In no way was my comment a personal attack, although I will on second thought strike the hyperbole at the end, wanting of course to keep a collaborative editing environment. 🐔 Chicdat Bawk to me! 11:42, 31 March 2025 (UTC)- Cinderella157 complaining about a personal attack. Pot meet kettle? Threats to take an issue to ANI means you want to waste people's valuable online time with something that you should be able to handle with a little discussion (or just not letting words affect you so much). Randy Kryn (talk) 11:56, 31 March 2025 (UTC)