Talk:Himalayan fossil hoax

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skepticism

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article was submitted to WikiJournal of Science for external peer review in 5 January 2024 (reviewer reports). It was published as Kholhring Lalchhandama; et al. (21 September 2024). "The Himalayan fossil hoax" (PDF). WikiJournal of Science. 7 (1): 8. doi:10.15347/WJS/2024.008. ISSN 2470-6345. Wikidata Q130230166.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link) and the updated content was reintegrated into the Wikipedia page under a CC BY-SA-3.0 license (2025).

I think this article deserves a better rating than "start-class"

The article is comprehensive, well structured, and well sourced. I think it exceeds the expectations for "start-class", and could do with another review. I'm brand new to wikipedia, so sorry if this is the wrong avenue for this! Micahtchi (talk) 12:38, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fully agree. I’ve changed it to C class. GraziePrego (talk) 03:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome! I am curious though, why? What differentiates it from higher classes? Micahtchi (talk) 03:14, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Peer-reviewed journal article published

The WikiJournal of Science has recently accepted a peer-reviewed article on this page, submitted by Chhandama. You can read the full peer review comments. If there are no oppositions, we would like to incorporate the peer-reviewed version into the existing Wikipedia article. Courtesy pinging @Micahtchi as they commented about the quality of the article just above. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 17:29, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No oppositions from me:) Micahtchi (talk) 05:16, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds fantastic! Happily support incorporating this version. GraziePrego (talk) 05:19, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks all. Seeing that there's no objections after a month, I will incorporate the contents from WikiJournal into this article and update the content rating to B. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 19:17, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The baton for the task of incorporating the WikiJournal article text here has been passed on to me. Here's hoping the task proves manageable. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:33, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]