Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Skepticism
 | This page was nominated for deletion on October 28, 2006. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 64 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
RfC at VPP on reform of FTN and FRINGE
[edit]Periyar has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 00:03, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
WikiProject JFK Assassination Files (Wikisource)
[edit]There is a new WikiProject over Wikipedia's sister-project Wikisource for the JFK Assassination Files release/being released by the U.S. government.
The goal of the project is to transcribe the documents released related to the assassination, so the information present in them is readable and easily accessible to everyone. If you are interested in joining or checking it out, please see WikiProject JFK Assassination Files. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 17:06, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for David Irving
[edit]David Irving has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 04:09, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Syracuse University
[edit]Syracuse University has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 03:46, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
"Wikipedia:NOLABLEAK" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect Wikipedia:NOLABLEAK has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 24 § Wikipedia:NOLABLEAK until a consensus is reached. TarnishedPathtalk 12:52, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Attachment therapy#Requested move 19 February 2025
[edit]There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Attachment therapy#Requested move 19 February 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPathtalk 09:59, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Good article assessment for Sailors' superstitions
[edit]Could somebody please assess if this is a C, B, or Good class article? Bearian (talk) 15:34, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
- I gave it a C. Good article assessments have a process which you must request here. Skyerise (talk) 15:55, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
Can someone please look at this draft and see if they agree with my judgment that it appears to be promotional by ufologists who think that Escamilla photographed UFOs rather than flying insects? Robert McClenon (talk) 03:09, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- I left comment on the talk page of the draft. Sgerbic (talk) 04:02, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Irlen syndrome
[edit]The Irlen syndrome article could use some attention. It used to say the syndrome and its treatment are psuedoscience, and is being overhauled to say that it's legit. I don't have the patience or access to sources to investigate. GA-RT-22 (talk) 23:20, 24 March 2025 (UTC)