Talk:Hennepin Avenue Bridge

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Minnesota Low‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

What does it mean "625 feet, which is small by modern standards?" Would modern people make an even longer bridge even though the river is small in that area? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jangles1 (talk • contribs) 04:15, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 20:00, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Father Louis Hennepin bridge

... that the Father Louis Hennepin bridge (pictured) was called "elegant" while also having a "Mussolini kind of quality"?

Source: Kaszuba, Mike (19 September 1989). "It's a beauty of a bridge, with a beauty of a price". Star Tribune. pp. 1, 6A. Retrieved 27 January 2025.

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Resignation services

5x expanded by Darth Stabro (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 26 past nominations.

~Darth Stabro^{Talk • Contribs} 05:42, 29 January 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Can the bolded link be changed to its official name of Father Louis Hennepin bridge? There's a hook for the original 1850s Hennepin Avenue bridge set to run on DYK. Departure– (talk) 14:48, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, scratch that, there's discussion ongoing at Wikipedia talk:Did you know#Three Hennepin Avenue Bridge hooks. I didn't see that you were the same nominator as the first hook, and that you made a second one in the same time. The outcome of that discussion will determine the outcome of a review on this hook. Departure– (talk) 15:12, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fine with that and have changed for this hook and also at Template:Did you know nominations/Hennepin Avenue Bridge (1888), and will also participate in the other discussion you started. ~Darth Stabro^{Talk • Contribs} 17:12, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just for clarity Departure–, do you plan on doing a full review on this one or was your remark just a comment? ~Darth Stabro^{Talk • Contribs} 14:56, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Darth Stabro: It was just a comment,

new reviewer needed. The DYK coordinators should sort out the hooks, as two are approved and can be promoted in an order that won't be contentious, as this one is lagging behind in getting a review. Departure– (talk) 16:53, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This article was 5x expanded over a week, so is new enough. It is long enough, well-sourced, and presentable. Image free and legible at low resolution. QPQ done. Hook interesting, cited, and citation checks out. Good to go. Tenpop421 (talk) 22:08, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just to head off possible confusion, there's two distinct DYK submissions, about two different bridges: