Talk:Gymnastics at the 2000 Summer Olympics – Women's artistic individual all-around

Gymnastics at the 2000 Summer Olympics – Women's artistic individual all-around has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 24, 2025. (Reviewed version).

Olympics Mid‑importance

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Gymnastics High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gymnastics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gymnastics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GymnasticsWikipedia:WikiProject GymnasticsTemplate:WikiProject GymnasticsGymnastics
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's sport: Gymnastics Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Women's gymnastics task force.

A fact from Gymnastics at the 2000 Summer Olympics – Women's artistic individual all-around appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 April 2025 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that an Olympic gymnast lost her gold medal after the women's artistic individual all-around because she used Nurofen, which contains pseudoephedrine, to treat her common cold?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2025/April. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gymnastics at the 2000 Summer Olympics – Women's artistic individual all-around.

Wikipedia

Disputed all around results

The numbers are off from athletes 15 and down, For example Kristin Maloney scored 9.543 on the vault. Please see http://www.gymnasticsresults.com/2000/o2000w.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by MATThematical (talk • contribs) 17:52, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

Passed. IAWW (talk) 00:01, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Gymnastics at the 2000 Summer Olympics – Women's artistic individual all-around/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Riley1012 (talk · contribs) 02:38, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: It is a wonderful world (talk · contribs) 19:18, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

After you reviewed a few of my GAs a feel it's only right to return the favour :) IAWW (talk) 19:18, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I made a few copyedits I didn't feel worth discussing, feel free to revert any issues. IAWW (talk) 19:19, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review It is a wonderful world! I believe I have addressed all of your comments. -Riley1012 (talk) 23:26, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Riley1012, I think you did a great job of addressing my concerns, especially on the comments regarding neutrality. I think this article is now ready to pass. Congrats! IAWW (talk) 00:00, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Prose (Criteria 1a, 1b, 4) clock

Lead

Could you add a brief summary of what the "all-around" is? Including what events they compete in, and what a "rotation" (referred to later in the article) is. IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest linking "Romania" to Romania at the 2000 Summer Olympics. IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest adding which nation Olaru and Xuan competed for, and linking the nations as above. IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Background

Suggest linking Russian as above. IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest adding in the prose what nation Viktoria Karpenko was competing for. IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Qualification results

Looks good ;)

Competition summary and vault height controversy

The countries could be linked as above.

This difference in height was enough to throw off a gymnast's timing and technique:

WP:NPOV: "avoid stating opinion as fact". I suggest attributing to expert consensus, or a specific expert.
There is an issue with tense here too. The word "was" is past tense, but "a gymnast's timing and technique" is a general idea. I suggest replacing "a" with "the". IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It could cause gymnasts to miss the contact between their hands and the vaulting horse, which had the potential to cause serious injures: Another tense inconsistency. It would be good to attribute this to an expert or consensus. IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

During the third rotation, Khorkina, who had not heard about the chance to re-do her vault, fell off the uneven bars: How is the option to re-do her vault related to her fall on the uneven bars? IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ray, also rattled from her mistakes on the vault: Opinion, attribute IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

allowing her to jump up 21 places in the standings: "allowing her" is a bit indirect. IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest linking the first instances the individual events are mentioned. I think it is quite likely the reader will want to know more about them. IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Romanian gymnast Andreea Răducan initially won the gold medal while her teammates, Simona Amânar and Maria Olaru won silver and bronze, respectively: Add a comma after the names to separate the non-restrictive appositive. IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Andreea Răducan doping

Suggest linking "common cold" IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

she did not fail the doping test because she weighed more than Răducan: Opinion, attribute IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The gold medal and silver medals: Do you mean "The gold and silver medals"? IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

was bumped up to the bronze medal: This doesn't quite make sense, because the bronze medal is not a position itself, but rather an award for finishing in third position. IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest linking "IOC president" IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dong Fangxiao age falsification

at the time of the Olympic Games: I think be precise that it was the 2000 Olympics. IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Final results

It looks really ugly having the references under the table like that, could they be added to a table caption to make it look better? IAWW (talk) 19:18, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aftermath

The FIG also noted that the officials responsible were reprimanded but did not reveal the details: I think "stated" is more neutral than "noted" here. IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sources clock

Health/formatting (Criterion 2a) Y

No current issues with link rot, but it would be nice if all links were archived to prevent issues in the future. Everything is formatted nicely. IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reliability (Criterion 2b) Y

All large newspapers, official reports, reliable athlete websites and subject specialist magazines/websites. I don't see any issues.

Spot check (Criteria 2b, 2c, 2d) clock

Spot check based on this version.

[1a]: The source doesn't say she was the favourite, and even if it did it would be an opinion and would need attribution. IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[1b]: Y

[6a]: Y

[7a]: Y

[10b, 13]: Y

[17]: Y

[18c]: Y

[27]: Y

[31a, 32]: Y

[41]: Y

Copyvio (Criterion 2d) Y

Earwig detects nothing, and all the sources are online so it is very unlikely it missed anything.

Scope (Criteria 3a, 3b) Y

It would be nice if there was some coverage of reputable media's reaction to the controversies, but I don't think this is needed for GA. IAWW (talk) 20:04, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stable (Criterion 5) Y

Media Y

No good images on Commons unfortunately.

Tags (Criterion 6a) Y

Captions (Criterion 6b) Y

Suggestions (not needed for GA promotion)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 20:05, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that an Olympic gymnast lost her gold medal after the women's artistic individual all-around because she used Nurofen, which contains pseudoephedrine, to treat her common cold?

Source: https://www.espn.com/oly/summer00/news/2000/0925/776388.html

Reviewed:

Improved to Good Article status by Riley1012 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

7kk (talk) 19:04, 30 March 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall:

Article was promoted to GA status within one week of its nomination. It is long enough and Earwig does not show that copyright violations are probable. QPQ not required, as this is one of your first five submissions. The hook is interesting and cited. Overall, I see no reason not to approve this submission. JJonahJackalope (talk) 13:30, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]