Talk:Fuji Television sexual harassment scandal

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Japan Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 20:32, April 6, 2025 (JST, Reiwa 7) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Neutrality of article

I'm concerned about the tone used in this article as well as its title, particularly "channel hostilities." The way it's currently written seems to sensationalize the events. lullabying (talk) 08:14, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The title is provisional, I put up that notice when I started translating the Japanese article. I was suggesting a name similar to the Japanese article, because the extant title was taken from the controversies section of the Fuji TV article. RandomMe98 (talk) 11:33, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If it's provisional, I think maybe it should have been drafted first and with feedback provided from other editors. What do you think it should be renamed to? "2025 Fuji TV sexual abuse allegations"? lullabying (talk) 06:01, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline

The section was tagged for "Prose", and was changed from the list form to paragraph form. Yet there is Wikipedia:Timeline and Wikipedia:Timeline standards, where it says that "Timelines describe the events that occurred before another event, leading up to it, causing it, and also those that occurred right afterward that were attributable to it. Timelines are often bulleted lists or tables. Timelines in paragraph format (proselines) are not recommended." I made the list of events in the section as an introduction, as the article's events are being detailed in the sections below, just to ease the following of the same. is there a problem if we let it be a list instead of paragraph? Or does it have to be forcefully in paragraph form, noting, again, that the rest of the article is detailing the events? SugaShikaoFans (talk) 04:11, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

From the looks of it, timelines seem to be used on list articles only. This article, particularly, is not a list. lullabying (talk) 05:58, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedback. I understand that the article is not a list. However, I don't see why it cannot include a timeline, especially when the "Category:Wikipedia timelines" page states "This category is for articles that are or contain timelines." If it mentions this, then there must be some articles in Wikipedia that contain them.

Although the information in the article is somewhat well-organized, it covers a wide range of topics such as the origin of the case, people involved, press conference details, and the company's involvement. Given the volume and diversity of information, a timeline would make it easier for readers and editors to follow the sequence of events. The list I created was meant to clarify the timeline and ensure that the information is accessible to everyone.

We could use, for example, Timeline of Rob Ford crack video scandal that, although it is not exactly like the case of the Fuji problem, it is a timeline that includes the extended information in each date. We can take this example and apply it to this article (which is both an extension of the Fuji TV article as much as Nakai's) and rename it, considering the article's name is also under discussion.

Alternatively, we could rename the section to "Chronology", which could apply better in the article as per WP:DATELIST and the examples shown here, or in this article SugaShikaoFans (talk) 08:13, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reliability of Dalton Investments and Usage of Primary Sources

May I asked what's the reliability of Dalton Investments? The other sources here are generally reliable, but Dalton Investments usage here feels like an abuse of WP:PRIMARYSOURCES. Thanks Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 04:59, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I was the one that included the links to D.I. I included them because they are the translated letters that they sent to Fuji, as I couldn't find another site that included them whole. If there is any problem regarding them and their being included, then feel free to take them off. I wanted to supplement the information in case anyone wanted to review it. SugaShikaoFans (talk) 06:57, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Name and focus

The content of the article seems to cover various controversies at Fuji TV, not just Nakai's case. We should rename this to something along the lines of "Fuji TV sexual harassment scandal". Jpatokal (talk) 06:29, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with this per my comment above. lullabying (talk) 04:17, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone ahead and moved this. The article still needs a lot of work, much of the content at the main Fuji Television article should probably be moved over here. Jpatokal (talk) 22:04, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]