Talk:Freedom Party of British Columbia

This article was nominated for deletion on 7 March 2025. The result of the discussion was redirect.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Freedom Party of British Columbia redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Canada: British Columbia / Politics Low‑importance

	Canada portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Political parties and politicians in Canada.

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Note re WP:COI (conflict of interest guidelines)

To party members who may wish to edit the article: please see WP:COI regarding conflict-of-interest concerning members of organizations editing articles about those organizations. this is a general comment/warning being placed on all BC political party pages because of problems with some articles...If you are a member of this party you should not be editing this article!!.Skookum1 01:30, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New party with same name registered, older party was de-registered in 2009

Hi,

I am trying to update the information that a new party with same name has been registered, and information about the new party.

What's the best way to go about it?

The new party can be verified at Elections BC Government website: https://elections.bc.ca/docs/fin/Registered-Political-Parties-Information.pdf

Why does my entry keeps getting reverted?

Thanks! Amrit.Birring (talk) 18:59, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can't hijack the article of a former party to represent a new party with the same name. The party also needs to become at least somewhat relevant before it deserves an article of its own! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 22:11, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation!

There are two issues here if I understand you correctly:

The new party is not relevant yet
The new party is piggybacking on top of older, de-registered party.

May I ask, if and when the new party becomes relevant, what will be the recourse? Should it have a new page of it's own or continue on top of the existing page. Please note that they have identical names and both in same jurisdiction. If a new page has to be created for the newer party, how will it be distinguished from the older party. The wikipedia url has this part: Freedom_Party_of_British_Columbia Amrit.Birring (talk) 02:20, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion it should have a separate page if there is no overlap between them beyond having the same name. They would be separate topics. It's always possible to put the year of founding in parentheses or some other identifying aspect to differentiate them. However I would wait until it gets a significant amount of press coverage. Dan Carkner (talk) 23:24, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am adding two references for the new party.

Can someone please help in vetting the references, and if they are legitimate, can they please be added to the page. There already exists one reference on the page, not from the ones below. Thanks!

https://www.surreynowleader.com/news/saturdays-anti-sogi-protest-in-surrey-was-a-missed-opportunity-to-educate-says-surrey-teacher/

https://vancouver.citynews.ca/2023/03/26/surrey-protest-sogi-b-c-schools/ 184.65.167.219 (talk) 21:22, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Those are reputable news sources, but I am not sure if this new party is notable enough to have a wikipedia article yet. See: Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) Dan Carkner (talk) 00:59, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Adding another source of information about the 'current' Freedom Party of British Columbia to make a case for it's own entry:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/surrey-sogi-protests-1.6878496 Amrit.Birring (talk) 04:35, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can make a case by writing its own article or draft, this article here is about an unrelated party with the same name as we've said above. Dan Carkner (talk) 13:49, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]