Talk:Floating solar

Energy High‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Environment Mid‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Floating solar is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Climate change High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

Scale of new chart

@Reywas92: Thanks for your observation re units on the new File:2009- Floating solar photovoltaic energy production - PV - bar chart.svg. I don't have access to the complete article ($31.50 for access), but looking at the Google search result image (here), the drawing indicates "MWh" units. This new chart is in contrast to the older chart with a common author Marco Rosa-Clotb, File:FPV installed capacity.jpg, which has "MWp" (peak) units. The numbers on the left scale are about the same. Are you suggesting I simply change MWh to MWp? I'm not sure enough of this technology to override what is in the reference. —RCraig09 (talk) 18:33, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I read the article with sci-hub. That might be correct. Reywas92^Talk 01:17, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Newly uploaded Version 2 of chart has new units on scale. For other readers: a nice explanation of the units is here. —RCraig09 (talk) 04:25, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was able to download the article through the university where I teach, and indeed the units on the graph are MWh per year. MWh and MWp are not the same. MWh is a measure of energy production. MWp is a measure of installed power generation capacity. The difference is analogous to the difference between distance (kilometers) and speed (kilometers per hour). In a reasonably good site, 1 MWp of solar panels will produce around 1,300 MWh of electricity per year. But that suggests an error in the Cazzaniga & Rosa-Clot article. Their estimate for 2019 is 1,656 MWh, which would suggest a bit over 1 MWp installed for that year. That's way too low. Christopher Greacen (talk) 08:12, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

misquote?

The text that reads: "This result depends on climate conditions and on the percentage of the covered surface. In arid climates such as parts of India this is an important advantage since about 30% of the evaporation of the covered surface is saved." doesn't seem to reflect what was written in the cited source: http://tehelka.com/do-floating-solar-panels-work-better/. The source says, "One thing is clear. As water evaporation from water bodies is to the tune of 30 percent, FPVs [floating solar] can reduce that to an extent, thus making water available for other uses.”

I think the text in the article should be changed to "Evaporation from reservoirs can reach 30% of water volume in a year in dry areas. Floating solar is expected to reduce this by absorbing a portion of the energy that would otherwise go into evaporating water.' (and then cite the same source)

Christopher Greacen (talk) 07:56, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Technology and Culture

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 August 2024 and 7 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Reeves50, PachinkoPanda222, TheodosiaBarbas, Buells, Rhylee.garcia (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Josephinebradley24.

— Assignment last updated by Josephinebradley24 (talk) 00:05, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed External Link: AccuSolar Floating Solar Resource

Hello editors,

I represent AccuSolar, a company focused on floating solar technology. We’ve published a technical article that may be relevant to this page. It covers how one of our floating solar arrays withstood Hurricane Milton and highlights design resilience and engineering challenges in floating solar—topics that seem relevant to this article.

Would it be appropriate to include this as a reference or in the External Links section?

Proposed link: https://www.accusolar.com/news/accusolar-floating-solar-array-withstands-hurricane-milton-a-testament-to-superior-design/

I’m sharing this here transparently and respectfully, and I welcome input or feedback. Thank you for your consideration. Accusolar (talk) 14:57, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]