Jump to content

Talk:Emperor Yingzong of Ming/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Min968 (talk · contribs) 09:15, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Borsoka (talk · contribs) 03:15, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
    C. It contains no original research:
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Image review

Source review

  • Make a separate list for primary sources and scholarly works.
  • Follow ABC order when listing the sources.
  • Robinson: ISSN is missing.
    I am not sure books and journals are to be liste separately. Borsoka (talk) 02:22, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Primary sources are frequently cited. How did you achive the application of our relevant policy, especially the one requiring a reliable secondary source for "any interpretation of primary source material"?
    @Min968: what is your anwer? Borsoka (talk) 03:55, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Borsoka These are the sources I currently have access to, and they are quite reputable. As for the policies, I haven't really read them thoroughly and don't fully understand them. Min968 (talk) 04:21, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Without understanding our sourcing policies, one can hardly able to complete a GA. I think they are quite clear. Ping me when you answered my above question. Borsoka (talk) 06:47, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Borsoka: Thank you for taking the time to review my work. The primary source is quite reputable and comprehensive, making it difficult to find similar information elsewhere. However, to avoid relying solely on information from a single source, I have supplemented it with some secondary sources. For example, in the case I encountered while writing about the Zhengde Emperor, Cambridge History, Volume 7 states that he died on 19 April 1521. However, when checking information from other sources such as Goodrich & Fang (1976), Ming Shi, and Ming Wuzong Shilu, they all record that he died on 20 April. Min968 (talk) 14:16, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • The secondary sources cited are academic works of high quality. Borsoka (talk) 03:28, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Emperor_Yingzong_of_Ming/GA1&oldid=1282136402"