Talk:Dunaújváros FC (1952)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fair use rationale for Image:Dunaferr SE.gif
[edit]
Image:Dunaferr SE.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 02:43, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Dunaujvaros.gif
[edit]
Image:Dunaujvaros.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 02:46, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Requested move 16 February 2025
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
![]() | It was proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved.
result: Move logs: source title · target title
This is template {{subst:Requested move/end}} |
References
- Note: a conflicting move request at Talk:Dunaújváros PASE has been merged into this one. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 03:25, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 21:04, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support per nom. GiantSnowman 21:07, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- As a WP:PTOPIC claim, is there evidence that the new team should be at the undisamgibuated location or should the page name be turned into a disambiguation page? (Oppose, for now; let's see the sources for the argument.) Bobby Cohn (talk) 16:11, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- (Comment following the relisting) Looking at the pageviews, I don't see enough here for a PTOPIC claim. As such,
- I suport disambiguation of Dunaújváros FC → Dunaújváros FC (1952)
- I still oppose Dunaújváros PASE → Dunaújváros FC.
- Open to an alternative Dunaújváros PASE → Dunaújváros FC (year)
- Create disambiguation at Dunaújváros FC.
- —Bobby Cohn (talk) 15:07, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- (Comment following the relisting) Looking at the pageviews, I don't see enough here for a PTOPIC claim. As such,
- Note: WikiProject Hungary and WikiProject Football have been notified of this discussion. Sophisticatedevening (talk) 14:31, 24 February 2025 (UTC)