Jump to content

Talk:Cyberwarfare and Iran

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

cyberwarfare in Germany

[edit]

What about cyberwarfare in Germany? [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.86.92.42 (talk) 22:41, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

Requested move 6 October 2019

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved per lack of objection (closed by non-admin page mover) DannyS712 (talk) 22:41, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Cyberwarfare in IranCyberwarfare and Iran – See article content with "Attacks by Iran" and "Attacks against Iran": Not just "in". X1\ (talk) 20:10, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 13 April 2025

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Adumbrativus (talk) 03:32, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Cyberwarfare and IranCyberwarfare by Iran – Per WP:CONSISTENT. Cyberwarfare by France, Cyberwarfare by Russia, Cyberwarfare by China. TurboSuperA+(connect) 17:48, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. The consistency question goes quite the other way: it is Cyberwarfare and China now. It is also Cyberwarfare and the United States. This makes sense of course because Cyberwarfare involves offensive and defensive capabilities, and attribution capabilities, all of which are intertwined. In the Iranian case specifically, the page discusses both attacks on Iran and attacks by Iran. It would make little sense to split these off. JArthur1984 (talk) 22:07, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I now see that although OP cited “Cyberwarfare by France”, that is actually only a redirect that goes to a subsection of the Cyberwarfare page.
So the WP:CONSISTENT question is even more favorable to keeping this page the same than I originally thought. JArthur1984 (talk) 02:13, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You're right. But should we then rename the Cyberwarfare by Russia article to Cyberwarfare and Russia? TurboSuperA+(connect) 05:29, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think a Russia page move is a good idea. JArthur1984 (talk) 12:19, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.