This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article was nominated for deletion on 3 February 2014. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Austria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles about Austria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AustriaWikipedia:WikiProject AustriaTemplate:WikiProject AustriaAustria
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bavaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bavaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BavariaWikipedia:WikiProject BavariaTemplate:WikiProject BavariaBavaria
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory, conspiracy theories, and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath
My watchlist this morning is full of what looks like this page getting moved back and forth between alternate titles. What's going on? Simonm223 (talk) 12:51, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Its now known fact its not conspiracy, cia documents released ages ago, and argentinian documents prove that he fled to argentina and harbour two children there. The russian remains with the bullet in the head are apparently female remains not hitlers 92.18.52.19 (talk) 12:59, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No, first because Hitler died in Berlin and secondly, nothing has been released yet that may be relevant to a fringe theory. Kierzek (talk) 02:10, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not disputing that he died in Berlin. I'm just saying that Milei's act of declassifying the files should be part of the article. To give a comparison, I want a reference to it similar to how Trump declassifying the JFK files is mentioned in the JFK assassination article. CerealContainer (talk) 00:31, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I've just removed a large amount of material cited almost entirely to primary sources - declassified US CIA and FBI files. This obviously violates WP:OR and WP:SYNTH. The material appears to have been added by UpdateNerd. UpdateNerd, it is long past time you to stop your disruptive editing of this article which has included giving credence to WP:FRINGE claims that Hitler survived. I would suggest that you move on, and will seek a topic ban if you do not. Nick-D (talk) 10:28, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Even the alleged photo, hmm? I understand that the content could be refined and contextualized, but one issue is that the different reports are themselves complex & yet to be discussed in full by bubblegum pop historians—but are of definite significance to the subject. UpdateNerd (talk) 11:44, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
UpdateNerd has re-added a range of material cited largely to primary sources (the same CIA and FBI files). I've removed this, and will progress a topic ban over coming days given the comment above suggests that this is a deliberate attempt to post WP:OR to the article. Nick-D (talk) 10:57, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Again, not opposing trimming of the material. The extended form, which I'm largely responsible for & won't attempt to reinstate, was getting long but clarified confusion (e.g. Citroën shared to CIA twice). Primary sources should support secondary ones when clarification is needed; not OR. Also noting a least a shorter overview including photo (similar to my attempted compromise edit) has persisted for years. But to be clear, walking away given the second removal, though I disagree. UpdateNerd (talk) 11:51, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Somajyoti ✉ 15:49, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
