Talk:Ciqikou station (Chongqing Rail Transit)
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 26 March 2025
[edit]
![]() | It has been proposed in this section that Ciqikou station (Chongqing Rail Transit) be renamed and moved to Ciqikou station. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Ciqikou station (Chongqing Rail Transit) → Ciqikou station – Disambiguation no longer needed. The Beijing subway station now uses the name "Ciqi Kou station". Courtesy ping to Johnj1995 who submitted this at RMTR after having a previous G6 (db-move) request on this reverted by Pppery on grounds of a potential PCM, so here it is! Intrisit (talk) 17:05, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
- Pinyin romanizations are known to be inconsistent in their use (or not) of spaces, so I don't see this as sufficient WP:SMALLDETAILS here. 162 etc. (talk) 16:25, 26 March 2025 (UTC) — Copied from WP:RMTR Intrisit (talk) 17:05, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
- My reason for contesting was along the lines of 162 etc.'s. I don't have anything more to say here. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:11, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
- Obviously not, as the ping was for clarity and posterity. After all, I would've enacted the "db-move" myself if I hadn't seen from the page history of the proposed title that the request nominator at RMTR (whom I've pinged) already did same before you reverted on grounds of a potential PCM, hence why I've enacted an RM here. Also 162 etc.'s comment above came just as (again) I was contemplating the "db-move" request myself. In short, I wasn't expecting any reaction from you anyway. Intrisit (talk) 17:38, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
- My reason for contesting was along the lines of 162 etc.'s. I don't have anything more to say here. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:11, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
- Pinyin romanizations are known to be inconsistent in their use (or not) of spaces, so I don't see this as sufficient WP:SMALLDETAILS here. 162 etc. (talk) 16:25, 26 March 2025 (UTC) — Copied from WP:RMTR Intrisit (talk) 17:05, 26 March 2025 (UTC)