Jump to content

Talk:Camp Hanuman Temple

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article needed work not dismantling

[edit]

Since the 28 February, the amendments to this page have made it worse. It started with information in bullet points that need to be turned into narrative and citations attached to the headings.

Rather than turning the citations into inline citations, they were deleted so the article appeared to be unsourced. Rather than turning bullet points into prose, the "now" unsourced material was deleted until the article was left with only a one line intro.

I'm reverting [restoring]* the 22 February version in order to turn the bullet points into prose and the heading citations into inline citations.

ash (talk) 10:05, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the sources were of extremely low quality, nevertheless. Chariotrider555 (talk)

Court vs court

[edit]

@Rich Farmbrough

Refer capitalising the c in court ash (talk) 04:46, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That is a Google search. Different people see different results. I also see an AI response, which won't be the same as the one you saw. You will have to be more specific. However you might prefer to look at Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Capital_letters#Institutions, which says:

Generic words for institutions, organizations, companies, etc., and rough descriptions of them (university, college, hospital, church, high school) do not take capitals.

In general Wikipedia uses a down style, and maintains consistency across different subjects across the encyclopaedia, even when there is a subject-specific practice in subject specific works. One example is common names of birds where we write "starling", but birders write "Starling". So it is with court, bill and act in the legal sphere, except when part of a proper noun, Cambridge University Press MoS and several others also follow the same practice.
All the best: Rich Farmbrough 22:49, 18 March 2025 (UTC).[reply]