This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religious texts, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Religious textsWikipedia:WikiProject Religious textsTemplate:WikiProject Religious textsReligious texts
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mormonism and the Latter Day Saint movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latter Day Saint movementWikipedia:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementTemplate:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementLatter Day Saint movement
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oriental Orthodoxy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on the Oriental Orthodox Church on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Oriental OrthodoxyWikipedia:WikiProject Oriental OrthodoxyTemplate:WikiProject Oriental OrthodoxyOriental Orthodoxy
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occult, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the occult on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OccultWikipedia:WikiProject OccultTemplate:WikiProject OccultOccult
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethiopia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ethiopia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EthiopiaWikipedia:WikiProject EthiopiaTemplate:WikiProject EthiopiaEthiopia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ancient Near East–related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East
There is no possible way that the original Book of Enoch was written in Ge'ez. Translated into Ge'ez in the first millennium CE, yes. Africologist (talk) 18:24, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article should clarify that the pseudepicraphical Book of Enoch is an extended retelling of the brief account of Enoch from the Book of Genesis, and is based on a quote from James the Just's brother Jude the Apostle. The quote appears, foundationally to the Book of Enoch, in its opening chapter {1:9).
Jude's phrase about Enoch being the "seventh from Adam" is referenced in a later emendation to the Book of Enoch, that was not found among the Dead Sea Scrolls. This emendation, known as the Book of Parables, likewise contains other New Testament borrowings. 2600:8801:CA00:DDD0:1C38:461:747C:51E5 (talk) 23:01, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The provided link is a personal blog, and as per WP:BLOGS it cannot be considered a reliable source, and therefore it cannot be used in Wikipedia. Sorry, these are the rules. A ntv (talk) 09:50, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, @A ntv: I wouldn’t be so quick in dismissing that blog. After all, the author is apparently Jude himself (“by Jude and the Book of Enoch”) so he ought to know, right?—Ermenrich (talk) 12:05, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just a continuation of the IP's attempt to get their original research added to Wikipedia, after they have been told NO multiple times. Making your own website doesn't somehow make it not OR. Get it published in a peer-reviewed journal or as a book: we don't source from blogs or personal websites. Skyerise (talk) 19:48, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
if someone wants to update that- 1 enoch, 2 noah, 3 abraham or melchizadek, 4 moses law tabernacle ark, 5 solomons temple, 6 temple destroyed 587 bc, 7 ???possibly to do with ezekiel 9 like in the animal apocalypse , 8 esther and rebuilding the second temple, 9 jesus, 10 rev 20 in the future. i added more references for maccabees and ezekiel too SamfromAus123 (talk) 04:18, 6 October 2024 (UTC) Added the source for the sword in Maccabees, and the 7 men one with writing instrument in Ezekiel. Don't delete it your you will be banned from wiki for vandalizing.[reply]
In the "Names of the fallen angels" section, the name "Gadriel" links to Gadreel. But this just links back to the same section, leading it to loop into itself. It's also stated to be another name for Azazel, which is not cited and I can't find repeated anywhere else. In the versions of the Book of Enoch I can find (mainly, these two: 1 and 2) the only reference to Gadreel, or any variant of the name, only states that he was the one to have tempted Eve. I don't think it was said to have been another name for Azazel, as far as I'm aware.
This is an article about a Jewish book.
The Jewish community does not believe that the Messiah has come.
To use "Before Christ" for dating in the article is inane and runs counter to standard practice in writing texts on history. RobertThePilgram (talk) 18:11, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Torah musa: you appear to be adding WP:OR to the page. Your source for the Ethiopian text being a mistranslation appears to be the Book of Enoch itself. Can you show any WP:RS that take this position, or show that it is the generally held position rather than that of an individual scholar?--Ermenrich (talk) 01:04, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]