Talk:Bibliographic index
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bibliographic index article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Proposed merge with Bibliographic database
[edit]See discussion at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015 July 4#Category:Bibliographic indexes. Randykitty (talk) 04:15, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
- hi I think you should merg them — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:602:8200:303:ADC6:46F8:4AD7:BF1F (talk) 16:50, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
This article seems to be about bibliographies as in the catalogs of references to documents. It should be noted that "bibliography" refers to at least two different concepts:
- bibliography (Q134995): the discipline or academic study (see bibliography or cataloging); also known as "bibliology"
- bibliography (Q1631107): a catalog of references to documents (especially published literature); sometimes printed in publications but also available in index card catalogs, and online databases
- I think the IP has it - confused understanding of the diff between bibliography meanings JarrahTree 01:50, 6 November 2016 (UTC)