Talk:Battle of Bhutala

Battle of Bhutala was nominated as a Warfare good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 7, 2025, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

This article was nominated for deletion on 18 January 2025. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Military history: Asian / Indian / South Asia / Medieval / Early Muslim

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Indian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)
	Early Muslim military history task force (c. 600 – c. 1600)

India: Rajasthan Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rajasthan (assessed as Mid-importance).

GA review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Battle of Bhutala/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Garudam (talk · contribs) 22:01, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk · contribs) 15:01, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am quick failing this nomination as the nominator has been indefinitely blocked and would not be able to respond to comments made, which I believe would be extensive considering the sparsity of sources used. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 15:01, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]