Talk:Age of Empires III: The Asian Dynasties
Appearance
![]() | The good article status of this article is being reassessed to determine whether the article meets the good article criteria. Please add comments to the reassessment page. Date: 13:08, 28 April 2025 (UTC) |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Age of Empires III: The Asian Dynasties article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "Age of Empires III: The Asian Dynasties" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Age of Empires III: The Asian Dynasties has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
Article review
[edit]It has been a while since this article has been reviewed, so I've taken another look at it and see that there are no citations for the "Gameplay" section. WP:VG/LEAD says that gameplay sections should be cited to secondary sources. Should this article go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 23:06, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
GA Reassessment
[edit]- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • GAN review not found
- Result pending
"Gameplay" section is missing citations, which Wikipedia:VG/LEAD states is necessary. Z1720 (talk) 13:08, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Z1720 The reception section is also quite lacking, given that there are reviews from reliable sources such as Eurogamer and Game Informer that aren't acknowledged in the prose or infobox. Sourcing the gameplay section would be a straightforward fix, but the problems with Reception show that there may be some GA Criteria #3 issues issues that need to be worked on. Just wanted to let you know! Fathoms Below (talk) 15:00, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delist Going back to the state the article was in when it was promoted, it is fully cited. However, it is still pretty lackluster compared to 2025 Good Article standards. It would really need a large amount of improvement. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 16:02, 28 April 2025 (UTC)