Talk:Aboriginal Community Benefit Fund
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Aboriginal Community Benefit Fund appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 January 2025 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 14:50, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the collapse of the Aboriginal Community Benefit Fund left 14,500 customers A$66 million out of pocket?
- Source: "When it finally collapsed earlier this year, it left 14,500 customers at least $66 million out of pocket, according to a recent liquidator's report."[1]
- ALT1: ... that the collapse of the Aboriginal Community Benefit Fund was described as a "slow-moving disaster" by the ABC? Source: "It was a slow-moving disaster that unfolded right under the noses of regulators. So, why did the Aboriginal Community Benefit Fund keep taking money from people for so long?"[2]
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Adam Sapi Mkwawa
Jpatokal (talk) 07:45, 27 December 2024 (UTC).
Approved. Article is new enough and long enough (created 27/12/24), and generally in good nick. No evidence of copyvio and no images to create any associated issues. BLP issues seem fine to me: all negative statements about living people are verifiable by good sources (I include Precedent here as the official publication of a reputable organisation). Hooks are interesting, supported and in line with the requirements. QPQ is done. It might be good to see more non-news sources, if they exist, in the article, but those chosen are quality outlets and I think NPOV has been well preserved despite the potentially emotive nature of the subject matter. UndercoverClassicist T·C 17:53, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
References
- ^ "This could be among the worst consumer rip-offs Australia's ever seen". August 3, 2022 – via www.abc.net.au.
- ^ "This could be among the worst consumer rip-offs Australia's ever seen". August 3, 2022 – via www.abc.net.au.
Categories:
- C-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- C-Class Finance & Investment articles
- Low-importance Finance & Investment articles
- WikiProject Finance & Investment articles
- C-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- C-Class Indigenous peoples of Australia articles
- Low-importance Indigenous peoples of Australia articles
- WikiProject Indigenous peoples of Australia articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles