This article is within the scope of WikiProject Google, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Google and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GoogleWikipedia:WikiProject GoogleTemplate:WikiProject GoogleGoogle
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Artificial Intelligence, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Artificial intelligence on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Artificial IntelligenceWikipedia:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceTemplate:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceArtificial Intelligence
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology
An AI summary is perfect for when there is no existing article. BUT, the AI must to careful to only use trusted references for its summary. It must also refrain and redact opinion from it created articles and any re-occurring opinions which are not negated and contested by other opinions should be expressed in the last paragraph of the article.
Perhaps also or instead of "there is no article on the subject" there should be a generate article button that follows the guidelines above which is then vetted by a human for broad-viewing; meanwhile the person who generated the article can see it as a temporary entity that vanishes to all but any highly trusted human editor who decides to approve it or amend it or reject it. The user then optional rates the quality of the generated article, and if the rating is 8 or more out of then 10, it then becomes a permanent backdoor entity for the editors to moderate. Once the article is approved by the editor, the approved article also has a separate rating system this time out of 5, and should users bring the median to 3 out of 5, the article is backdoored again until further amendments are made. I feel like the the quality of most Wikipedia articles is above this rating system except for Biographies or otherwise summaries of a person, group or event; these I believe should have this rating system as well though the backdoor median should be 2 out of 5 as to keep most of these articles online and not cause chaos. Only logged in persons and person not behind a VPN should be able to vote. Therein are the Godfathers recommendations.
Please see WP:NOTFORUM: bear in mind that article talk pages exist solely to discuss how to improve articles; they are not for general discussion or voicing opinions about the article topic or anything else. Regards, HaeB (talk) 18:12, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The redirect AI Overviews has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 1 § AI Overviews until a consensus is reached. Jay 💬 06:45, 1 April 2025 (UTC)