Jump to content

Talk:1990 United States Senate election in Delaware/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history)ย ยท Article talk (edit | history)ย ยท Watch

Nominator: OlifanofmrTennantย (talkย ยท contribs) 00:45, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: History6042ย (talk ยท contribs) 20:07, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I will do this one for WP:GARC. History6042๐Ÿ˜Š (Contact me) 20:07, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@History6042: reminder Olliefant (she/her) 15:07, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I am so sorry, I forgot about this. History6042๐Ÿ˜Š (Contact me) 16:04, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]

Comments will be given soon. History6042๐Ÿ˜Š (Contact me) 17:48, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No issues with image use or licensing. History6042๐Ÿ˜Š (Contact me) 17:48, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No issues with edit conflicts, or scope. History6042๐Ÿ˜Š (Contact me) 17:52, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Earwig found no issues. History6042๐Ÿ˜Š (Contact me) 22:15, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed all prose issues myself. History6042๐Ÿ˜Š (Contact me) 22:26, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Spotchecked 1, 12, and 23. All were good, I will pass the article. History6042๐Ÿ˜Š (Contact me) 12:36, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.