Jump to content

Talk:1990 United States Senate election in Delaware

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Byte count

[edit]

As of March 11, 2025 at 22:27 the byte count of this page is 205. A dyk will require 1,025 bytes Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 22:27, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 23:04, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by OlifanofmrTennant (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 21 past nominations.

Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 17:56, 12 March 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article was 5x expanded starting 11 March. No issues of copyvio or plagiarism. All sources appear reliable. Hooks are interesting and sourced. QPQ is done. Looks ready to go. Thriley (talk) 19:17, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:1990 United States Senate election in Delaware/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: OlifanofmrTennant (talk · contribs) 00:45, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: History6042 (talk · contribs) 20:07, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I will do this one for WP:GARC. History6042😊 (Contact me) 20:07, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@History6042: reminder Olliefant (she/her) 15:07, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I am so sorry, I forgot about this. History6042😊 (Contact me) 16:04, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]

Comments will be given soon. History6042😊 (Contact me) 17:48, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No issues with image use or licensing. History6042😊 (Contact me) 17:48, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No issues with edit conflicts, or scope. History6042😊 (Contact me) 17:52, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Earwig found no issues. History6042😊 (Contact me) 22:15, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed all prose issues myself. History6042😊 (Contact me) 22:26, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Spotchecked 1, 12, and 23. All were good, I will pass the article. History6042😊 (Contact me) 12:36, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.