Draft:United States Prestige Proof Sets
 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 8 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 897 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 3 June 2025 by Pythoncoder (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 6 April 2025 by Sophisticatedevening (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Sophisticatedevening 2 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 2 March 2025 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by DoubleGrazing 3 months ago.
| |
United States Prestige Proof Sets
The United States Prestige Proof Set is a type of proof coin set issued by the United States Mint annually from 1983 to 1997. Each set includes proof versions of the circulating U.S. coins for that year together with one or more commemorative coins.
History
[edit]The Prestige Proof Set was first introduced in 1983, alongside the release of the 1983 Olympic silver dollar, the first commemorative coin issued by the U.S. Mint in nearly three decades[1]. The Mint designed the set to combine standard circulating coinage with commemorative coins in one package.
Each set was packaged in a hardcover, book-style case with a fitted insert and protective outer box[2]. The series was discontinued after 1997, as demand declined and the U.S. Mint shifted its focus to other collector-oriented products.
Design and Composition
[edit]The coins in the Prestige Proof Sets were struck at the San Francisco Mint[3]. The set included:
- Lincoln cent, Jefferson nickel, Roosevelt dime, Washington quarter, and Kennedy half dollar proof coins
- One commemorative silver dollar and optionally one commemorative half-dollar, depending on the year
The commemorative coins featured designs authorized by congressional coin programs[4] for each year. For example, the 1986 set included the Statue of Liberty Centennial silver dollar and half dollar, while the 1993 set featured coins from the Bill of Rights commemorative program.
Table of Prestige Proof Sets (1983–1997)
[edit]The following table lists each annual Prestige Proof Set, including images of the front (obverse), back (reverse), and presentation box.
| Year | Commemorative Half Dollar | Commemorative Dollar | Mintage | Obverse | Reverse | Box |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1983 | none | 1984 Summer Olympics Dollar | 140,361 |  |
 |
|
| 1984 | none | 1984 Summer Olympics Dollar | 316,680 |  |
 |
|
| 1986 | Statue of Liberty Half Dollar | Statue of Liberty Dollar | 599,317 |  |
 |
|
| 1987 | none | United States Constitution Bicentennial Dollar | 435,495 |  |
 |
|
| 1988 | none | 1988 Summer Olympics Dollar | 231,661 |  |
 |
|
| 1989 | U.S. Congress Bicentennial Half Dollar | U.S. Congress Bicentennial Dollar | 211,807 |  |
 |
|
| 1990 | none | Eisenhower Centennial Dollar | 506,126 |  |
 |
|
| 1991 | Mount Rushmore Anniversary Half Dollar | Mount Rushmore Anniversary Dollar | 256,954 |  |
 |
|
| 1992 | 1992 Summer Olympics Half Dollar | 1992 Summer Olympics Dollar | 183,293 |  |
 |
|
| 1993 | Bill of Rights Half Dollar | Bill of Rights Dollar | 224,045 |  |
 |
|
| 1994 | 1994 World Cup Half Dollar | 1994 World Cup Dollar | 175,893 |  |
 |
|
| 1995 | Civil War Battlefield Half Dollar | Civil War Battlefield Dollar | 107,112 |  |
 |
|
| 1996 | Centennial Olympics Half Dollar (Soccer) | Centennial Olympics Dollar (Rowing) | 55,000 |  |
 |
|
| 1997 | none | Botanic Garden Dollar | 80,000 |  |
 |
|
Discontinuation
[edit]By the mid-1990s, sales of the Prestige Proof Set had declined compared to earlier years[2]. The final set was issued in 1997, after which the Mint ceased production of the series.
See Also
[edit]- United States Proof Set
- Commemorative coins of the United States
- List of United States commemorative coins and medals (1980s)
- List of United States commemorative coins and medals (1990s)
References
[edit]- ^ Lange, David (2010). A Guide Book of United States Proof Sets (2nd ed.). Whitman Publishing. ISBN 978-0794828608.
- ^ a b Coin History: United States Prestige Proof Sets
- ^ What is a Prestige Proof Mint Set?
- ^ Commemorative Coins
- Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
- Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
- Essay-like writing
- Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
- Close paraphrasing
Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.