Draft:Chris Macdonald (scientist)
![]() | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 2 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,435 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 21 March 2025 by SafariScribe (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 18 March 2025 by Cabrils (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Cabrils 3 days ago. | ![]() |
Comment: Well done on creating the draft, and it may potentially meet the relevant requirements (including WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, WP:NPROF) but presently it is not clear that it does. As you may know, Wikipedia's basic requirement for entry is that the subject is notable. Essentially subjects are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. To properly create such a draft page, please see the articles ‘Your First Article’, ‘Referencing for Beginners’ and ‘Easier Referencing for Beginners’. Please note that some of the references are not from sources that are considered reliable for establishing notability and should be removed (including blogs, company websites, Twitter, YouTube, Instagram, Spotify etc). Also, if you have any connection to the subject, including being the subject (see WP:AUTOBIO) or being paid, you have a conflict of interest that you must declare on your Talk page (to see instructions on how to do this please click the link). Please familiarise yourself with these pages before amending the draft. If you feel you can meet these requirements, then please make the necessary amendments before resubmitting the page. It would help our volunteer reviewers by identifying, on the draft's talk page, the WP:THREE best sources that establish notability of the subject. It would also be helpful if you could please identify with specificity, exactly which criteria you believe the page meets (eg "I think the page now meets WP:NPROF criteria #3, because XXXXX"). Once you have implemented these suggestions, you may also wish to leave a note for me on my talk page and I would be happy to reassess. As I said, I do think this draft has potential so please do persevere. Cabrils (talk) 02:15, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Dr Chris Macdonald is a scientist, founder, and author. He is a Lab Director and Fellow at the University of Cambridge, and a Fellow at the Institute of Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability [1][2][3]. His research has been widely covered by mainstream media[4][5][6][7][8][9]. He is the founder of the online platform, Virtual Reality Public Speaking [6][7][8][9], that provides free treatment for speech anxiety. He is the author of Operation Sustainable Human, a book that explores the most impactful climate solutions[10][11]. Dr Macdonald was the recipient of the UK 40 Under 40 Award in the Science and Innovation category[12].
References
[edit]- ^ Walsh, Louise (2025-03-14). "Free tech eliminates the fear of public speaking". www.cam.ac.uk. Retrieved 2025-03-16.
- ^ "Dr Chris Macdonald | Lucy Cavendish". www.lucy.cam.ac.uk. Retrieved 2025-03-20.
- ^ "ICRS Fellows Register".
- ^ Davis, Nicola (2025-03-15). "Free online virtual reality tool helps people tackle public speaking nerves". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2025-03-16.
- ^ Blakely, Rhys (2025-03-14). "Can a virtual reality headset cure your fear of public speaking?". www.thetimes.com. Retrieved 2025-03-16.
- ^ a b ITV News, TV report. "Could virtual reality be the answer to your fear of public speaking?".
- ^ a b View, The Times (2025-03-14). "How virtual reality can cure your fear of public speaking". www.thetimes.com. Retrieved 2025-03-20.
- ^ a b Dolan, Eric W. (2025-03-16). "New virtual reality platform helps users overcome public speaking anxiety — and it's free". PsyPost - Psychology News. Retrieved 2025-03-20.
- ^ a b "Mobile-based free VR tool is helping people beat speech anxiety". Digital Trends. 2025-03-16. Retrieved 2025-03-20.
- ^ "Operation Sustainable Human". Have You Read This. 2019-11-08. Retrieved 2025-03-21.
- ^ "Takeaways from the climate summit". theecologist.org. 2019-09-25. Retrieved 2025-03-21.
- ^ "WINNERS – Forty Under 40 Awards UK". Retrieved 2025-03-20.
- Draft articles on internet culture
- Draft articles on software
- Draft articles on technology
- AfC submissions on science, mathematics and engineering
- Pending AfC submissions
- AfC pending submissions by age/0 days ago
- AfC submissions by date/21 March 2025
- AfC submissions by date/20 March 2025
- AfC submissions by date/16 March 2025
- meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
- or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth
Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.