Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2025 February 21
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:43, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
not needed, all articles are transcluding from the main 2017 Super 8s article Frietjes (talk) 22:12, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:17, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2025 March 2. (non-admin closure) it's lio! | talk | work 06:52, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
- Template:WikiProject_U.S._Roads/U.S._Route_66_task_force (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:21, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
No longer used. (It is currently transcluded to one user page but predates that user's activity by 10 years.) – Fayenatic London 12:52, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:17, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2025 February 28. ✗plicit 14:19, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- Template:Aviation_accidents_and_incidents_in_Senegal (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per G5 SmartSE (talk) 15:14, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
This is at best going to be an unmaintainable mess with significant NPOV issues. The problem is what is considered historically female work is going to vary massively by area and time even within the same country. For example in some areas of the UK basically any non technical coal mining job other than getter would have been considered work for women and girls. In others women hardly featured underground. Then it was made literally illegal for women to work underground. So depending on the area hurrier historically female work, never female work or work up until it was made illegal.
This means there is a lot of stuff where its inclusion or lack of inclusion will create POV issues. Size is also an issue. Woman have done a vast range of work over the centuries. ©Geni (talk) 06:10, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- I don't need to be derided by you! I welcome all contributions that better refine what is and what is not historically female work by area and time. I think the intention of the template is clear, cover work that is associated with womanhood, often stigmatisingly so. Réalgard (talk) 12:00, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- I think we should start with creating the article Historically female work to tie this navigation template together. With that article in place, we can start to talk about the content of the template. The Banner talk 13:38, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- The creator is a blatant sock of Lau737 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) so I will G5. SmartSE (talk) 15:13, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:18, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- Template:Full party name with color (parenthesis) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Seemingly unused and invokes a function in a nonexistent module Module:Party name with color (parenthesis). Contacted creator of the page on their user talk and have not heard back after 3-4 days. ~ Rusty meow ~ 04:00, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- delete, non-functional. Frietjes (talk) 15:38, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per above --Lenticel (talk) 00:13, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:17, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: this can probably be G7'ed, see [1] ~ Rusty meow ~ 00:26, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:19, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
No article about the team, so any navigation would hang in the air. The Banner talk 02:34, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:17, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. ~ Rusty meow ~ 00:26, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.