Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2025 February 16
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Pppery (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:12, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
Unused template; only linked from itself. MikeVitale 22:17, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete Could add a toggleable feature (specific birthdate notice) to either
{{BLP}}
or{{BLP editnotice}}
if this ever arises. Tule-hog (talk) 19:12, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Template was created at a time of seeing several unref/unjustified birth date changes. It seems less critical now, as it is probably more effective to rely on such actions as page protection, user warnings/blocks, reverts. BLP editnotice option also seems a good approach; but what would be the corresponding editnotice for a "BDP"? Dl2000 (talk) 22:56, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom due to lack of usage; consider alternatives per Dl2000 it's lio! | talk | work 01:01, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete * Pppery * it has begun... 00:54, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Broken template that is unrelated to Template:Colort and used only in place of Template:Color swatch. For some reason I cannot get this one to display correctly in dark mode. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 21:48, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:58, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom it's lio! | talk | work 01:00, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Keep * Pppery * it has begun... 00:53, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Only two links to articles. Minus the fact the main article linked as a redirect. Rest are for categories. No navigation is met with this template. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:40, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete I don't think this TfD is subject to WP:ARBPIA. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 06:23, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- Keep Seems a fine navigation template to me, although I haven't seen one with this ratio of article/category links before. That said, categories are used to browse Wikipedia and locate content as well. Tule-hog (talk) 19:08, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- Navboxes are to link to articles. Please read Wikipedia:Navbox. Its clear from your vote you are not aware of what navboxes are for. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:30, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- I have added a row for 3 US film festivals for Palestinian cinema, and replaced a redlink that should have been removed after Fastily deleted a category. With 5 article links, it seems more worthwhile now. – Fayenatic London 22:36, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- Only four links. Still falls shorts after removing links to categories. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:59, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- @WikiCleanerMan: links to categories are commonly included in similar templates in Category:Film country navigational boxes. WP:NAVBOX is a section in a page comparing the use of categories, lists and templates to navigate between articles; it does not prohibit links to categories in navboxes. – Fayenatic London 21:00, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- Only four links. Still falls shorts after removing links to categories. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:59, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- keep, seems fine to me. Frietjes (talk) 23:19, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- Keep: valid topic (I counted 52 blue links on the list article), relevant transclusions, part of a series of templates (search Template:Cinema of), but most importantly, potential for further expansion with reference to the main article (@Fayenatic london: maybe add directors and see also as well?) it's lio! | talk | work 00:57, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- I added the cinemas, but don't think the others are appropriate for a navbox. – Fayenatic London 21:14, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- Keep, template now links to 11 articles, top category, related category and Commons. I believe the People categories row should also be re-added, like its international counterparts.[1] – Fayenatic London 21:14, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was withdrawn. (non-admin closure) –Aidan721 (talk) 20:02, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
All redlinks or redirects. –Aidan721 (talk) 19:22, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Keep Nominator disruptively redirected all articles without consensus. This has been reverted. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:43, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Bad faith nomination after messing up the links. The Banner talk 19:57, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Bad faith nomination. JustSomeoneNo (talk) 13:35, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 11:17, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Template for a non-existing subject (Progressive groups in the US). And an overly broad scope. The Banner talk 14:45, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- KEEP. the underlying focus is taken directly from the info sidebar for this topic,namely Template:New Democrats Sm8900 (talk) 03:21, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- Are you referring to
{{Progressivism sidebar}}
here? Tule-hog (talk) 19:09, 17 February 2025 (UTC)- actually it is Template:New Democrats Sm8900 (talk) 20:08, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- Should the template instead be named
{{New Democrats navbox}}
? Otherwise the current name implies a focus on the blanket topic Progressivism in the United States. Tule-hog (talk) 21:10, 17 February 2025 (UTC)- ok, sure i can rename it to {{New Democrats topics}}.is that ok with everyone? by the way, the word "topics" is a consistent term to use in a navbox title; the word "navbox" would generally not be in the title. Sm8900 (talk) 03:42, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- As long as it refers to an existing article, it is fine to me. The Banner talk 12:55, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- ok, sure i can rename it to {{New Democrats topics}}.is that ok with everyone? by the way, the word "topics" is a consistent term to use in a navbox title; the word "navbox" would generally not be in the title. Sm8900 (talk) 03:42, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Should the template instead be named
- actually it is Template:New Democrats Sm8900 (talk) 20:08, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- Are you referring to
- Per above, rename to "New Democrats topics" with New Democrats (United States) as the title. However I still believe that the "concepts" and "ideology" rows in the original template are too broad. "Concepts" isn't in Template:New Democrats anyway. it's lio! | talk | work 00:43, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- ok
Done Sm8900 (talk) 00:51, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
- But still no backlink to an article :-) The Banner talk 03:21, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
- ok
- the article link is on the first line. but i can add it in the title as well.
--Sm8900 (talk) 15:43, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.