Wikipedia:Peer review/Wonder Woman (2017 film)/archive1

Wonder Woman (2017 film)

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because I'm planning to nominate it as a Featured Article, but I'm not sure of the article's quality yet, so I'm listing it here to get feedback.

Thanks, Lililolol (talk) 21:45, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding structure, "Design" should be listed before "Filming", and the entirety of "Cinematography and Visual" should be integrated into either the "Design" or "Filming" section, with visual effects info retained in a post-"Filming" section of either "Post-production" or "Visual effects". Finally, "Music" should be a level 2 heading, not a level 3 under "Production". - Favre1fan93 (talk) 23:16, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Favre1fan93 Hi, and omg, I have forgotten about this! Lol. sorry, but what do you mean by level 3? Lililolol (talk) 19:38, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I disagree. I don’t think Cinematography and Visual Effects fit neatly under Filming because, based on other articles I’ve looked at, they often have their own sections like Visual Effects, Cinematography, and so on. So I feel it’s appropriate to leave them as they are, right? Lililolol (talk) 19:42, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Lililolol: what do you mean by level 3? WP:SECTIONLEVELS. Two == is your level two headings (currently Plot, Cast, etc.). Three === is your level three headings for subsections. My comments still stand that you need to rework the heading levels and where content exists. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 22:08, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Favre1fan93 Alright, I’ll fix the heading structure and move some content around. Bur bbout the idea of splitting Accolades and Cultural impact into a new article, what do y’all think? I’m kind of for it, but not sure the new article would stand well on its own. Still, it could help reduce this article’s length. Or maybe we could just use {{Collapse top|title=}} for the Accolades and make Cultural impact a subsection under Cultural response instead? Lililolol (talk) 19:37, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have no issues with those sections as they are currently. No need for splitting in my opinion. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:43, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]