Jump to content

Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Tiberius/1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Clear consensus to delist. Issues include uncited material and overreliance on primary sources. There are also concerns about OR and coverage, and I see further issues with the popular culture section. UndercoverClassicist T·C 12:36, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Uncited statements, especially in the sections "Popular culture" and "Marriages and issue". Z1720 (talk) 19:00, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed the missing citations on Marriages and issue. I would be more concerned about the overreliance on primary sources. We have biographies of this man; but instead the text is doing wildly inappropriate WP:OR with things like Had he died before AD 23, he might have been hailed as an exemplary ruler and citing this to Tacitus' discussion starting It is however, I think, a convenient opportunity for me to review [how that year] brought with it the beginning of a change for the worse in Tiberius's policy. Either way, delist. Ifly6 (talk) 23:26, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I've put up a notice for some of the issues I identified in this edit. Ifly6 (talk) 20:49, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delist numerous paragraphs do not cite any modern secondary sources, paragraphs that cite one are the exception. Psychastes (talk) 19:07, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Looking briefly at the Germanicus section, I see selective adoption of the narrative of primary sources with a touch of I, Claudius, with a secondary source cited at one point. There's no mention of his insubordination towards our subject, in command in Germany (with consequent disasters), in resisting recall, and in touring Egypt - contrast, say, the OCD on Germanicus. NebY (talk) 22:00, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.