Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Syria/1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Delisted. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 01:31, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
Clearly meets criteria as it contains adequate and current information and is neutral. It contains present information such as the population and has many citations with none that I saw that had original research. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 00:20, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
- Not sure this ever was a real GA article .... looking at Talk:Syria/GA1 this clearly wouldn't fly today and I'm not sure how it passed in this manner years ago. Moxy🍁 00:33, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
- It is not, that GAN failed. Feedoxm, I believe you meant to nominate at GAN, but I would suggest against it. This is a quickfail due to large chunks of uncited text. CMD (talk) 00:39, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.