Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Stan Marsh/1

Stan Marsh

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Kept. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 16:18, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Could have violated WP:NPOV and has a lack of cites on some sentences. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 23:29, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please give examples of how it violates NPOV as from a quick glance I have not noticed it? Also, can you please give examples of sentences needing cites to help people wanting to improve the article? DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 04:26, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Freedoxm: saying "could have violated" makes you seem unsure of there actually being NPOV violations, and every single paragraph is sourced (not every sentence needs to be sourced), so i'm leaning towards a keep until there are actually problems pointed out. 750 h+ 08:42, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - There's at least one dead citation which wasn't archived, despite other sources in the article having archived links. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 23:24, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All links fixed! LastJabberwocky (talk) 12:39, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.