Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Golden Temple/1

Golden Temple

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • GAN review not found

Result: Delisted. Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 15:48, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Poorly reviewed by a blocked user and should return to GAN's queue. During the DYK process, a copyright violation and failed verification was already found immediately by Dclemens1971. The prose doesn't look good either. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 03:16, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

can try to help address some of these issues. Eucalyptusmint (talk) 14:15, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Eucalyptusmint Do you still plan on working on this? Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 17:56, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I did not go through it with a fine-toothed comb but I would agree this needs a close look and may warrant delisting. The GAR should have caught the copyvio. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:15, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.