Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Men's T20 World Cup/archive2
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was archived by Gog the Mild via FACBot (talk) 6 May 2025 [1].
- Nominator(s): Vestrian24Bio 03:08, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Since the previous FFAC earlier this year, the article has gone through re-writes and now passed GAN. I think it's ready for an FAC now. Vestrian24Bio 03:08, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Image review
- Avoid sandwiching text and displacing headings - see MOS:IMAGELOC
- Avoid duplicating captions in alt text
- File:ICC_Men's_T20_World_Cup_Trophy_at_COA_-_BugWarp_(20)_(cropped).jpg: what's the copyright status of the trophy?
- File:As_of_Men's_T20_World_Cup_2024.png: see MOS:COLOUR. Nikkimaria (talk) 19:04, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Nikkimaria:
- Removed two images as otherwise they'd result in a whitespace due to the sidebars.
- Done.
- Own work by User:BugWarp.
- MOS:COLOR doesn't say much about the colors on images; could you be specific about the issue.
- Vestrian24Bio 10:29, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
- The photo is own work; my question is about the trophy being photographed.
- "Avoid using color as the sole means of conveying information. Always provide an alternative method, such as an accessible symbol matched to a legend, or footnote labels. Otherwise, blind users or readers accessing Wikipedia through a printout or device without a color screen will not receive that information." Nikkimaria (talk) 13:33, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Nikkimaria:
- According to ICC's BRAND AND CONTENT PROTECTION GUIDELINES - "[...] used for news reporting purposes in non-commercial, editorial pieces without the ICC’s prior authorisation" and "Websites that provide information about the Event and are being operated on a purely non-commercial basis [...] are unlikely to infringe the ICC’s rights". - Not sure if this qualifies; if not I'll remove the image.
- "Avoid using color as the sole means of conveying information" - I'm not sure how exactly that applies to images; but anyhow all of that information are also provided as text in the nearby table.
- Vestrian24Bio 12:55, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Nikkimaria:
- "Avoid using color as the sole means of conveying information. Always provide an alternative method, such as an accessible symbol matched to a legend, or footnote labels. Otherwise, blind users or readers accessing Wikipedia through a printout or device without a color screen will not receive that information." Nikkimaria (talk) 13:33, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
- For our purposes, non-commercial restrictions are non-free. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:52, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Nikkimaria: removed now. Vestrian24Bio 11:07, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
- For our purposes, non-commercial restrictions are non-free. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:52, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Coordinator note
[edit]This has been open for more than three weeks and has attracted very little interest. Unless it attracts considerable movement towards a consensus to promote over the next three or four days I am afraid that it is liable to be archived. Gog the Mild (talk) 10:53, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
- Closing note: This candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FAC/ar, and leave the {{featured article candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Gog the Mild (talk) 16:41, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.