Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron – Rescue list
- Note that this wikiproject is only intended to improve the encyclopedia. The project is not about casting votes or vote-stacking. Be sure to follow the guideline on canvassing. This means, in part, that you should use Template:Rescue list on the deletion discussion page when you list the discussion here.
- Focus on improving content. For example, when working on an article listed for rescue, try to qualify topic notability by adding reliable-source references with significant coverage of the topic. Edit the content to address specific concerns raised in the AfD discussion.
- Show the light. If you comment in an AfD discussion, try to describe points in the nomination that have been corrected. Note any remaining deficiencies (e.g. lack of organization, structural problems, lack of balance, etc.). Base comments upon Wikipedia's deletion policy. If an article has been rewritten, you may place a comment in the AfD as a courtesy to assist the closing admin in determining which article version others were referring to.
- For more information about article rescue, please refer to ARS Tips to help rescue articles and ARS Rescue guide
- For additional article improvement listings, check out this project's archives and listings at WikiProject Cleanup
This is a list and discussion of Wikipedia content for rescue consideration. When posting here, please be sure to:
- First familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's guidelines for topic notability and identifying reliable sources, as well as the prohibition on inappropriate canvassing
- Include a specific rationale why the article/content should be retained on Wikipedia, and any ideas to improve the content. Please ensure that your comment here is neutrally worded. (You can also !vote to delete an article at its deletion discussion because you think it is untenable in its present state, and still list it here in the hope that another editor will find a way to improve it and save it.)
- You should disclose in a deletion discussion that a post has been made at the rescue list.
- Sign posts with four tildes ~~~~.
- Place the {{subst:rescue list|~~~~}} template in Articles for deletion discussions, to notify editors about the listing here. The tag can be placed below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
The following templates can be used for articles listed here:
- *{{Find sources|Article name}} - Adds source search options
- *{{lagafd|Article name}} - Adds relevant links
- *{{lagafd|Article name|Article name (2nd nomination)}} - Likewise but for page nominated twice
- *{{lagafd|Article name|Article name (3rd nomination)}} - Likewise but for page nominated 3 times
- *{{lagafd|Article name|Article name (Nth nomination)}} - Likewise but for page nominated N ≥ 4 times
|
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
ATTENTION! Go to https://wikipedialibrary.wmflabs.org/ to apply for access to multiple databases to search for sources to help save and improve articles.
This page I created was nominated for deletion, arguing that it doesn't meet WP:GNG and it is an "inherently local topic". After some research, I've added sources from the Wall Street Journal, US Federal News Service, among others. Furthermore, after researching on Newspapers.com, this WSJ article appears in publications across the country including the Miami Herald, Belleville News-Democrat, Chicago Tribune, The Day, of New London, Connecticut, and The Washington Herald, among others. Is there anything I can do to improve this page? In my vote to keep I added that I would not be opposed to a merge of this page with Landlord harassment, and would much rather that, in conjunction with improving it to its best, than having it be outright deleted. Thank you for your consideration. Best, AwkoTaco19 (talk) 15:56, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Internationality, which addresses the rather fundamental concept that some things are International (i.e., involving more than one country), has been nominated for deletion. I am confident that any deficiencies in the article can be resolved. BD2412 T 03:09, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
August Capital was nominated for deletion. There appears to be plenty of good sourcing out there. This one from Axios has been ignored: [1]. I’d appreciate any help in finding sources. Thriley (talk) 19:42, 5 January 2025 (UTC)