Jump to content

User talk:Zaptain United

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aeroflot Flight 9981 (March 31)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 04:44, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Zaptain United! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 04:44, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

[edit]
The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Zaptain United! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you have questions, just use this link to ask for help; a volunteer will visit you here shortly!

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Lolzer3k 14:44, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aeroflot Flight 9981 moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Aeroflot Flight 9981. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and sources that provide significant/in-depth continued coverage of the crash (see WP:N(E)). I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 19:38, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to China Eastern Airlines Flight 586. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because the references need to be properly cited. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 19:40, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I saw that you reverted my edit on Colgan Air Flight 3407 to use File:Crash site of Colgan Air Flight 3407, Feb 2009.jpg in the article. Now your reasoning for this was "I disagree with changing the image as the image of the tail as it is a pretty infmaous image for thsi crash and also the image you replace is just a bunch of scatter wreckage." However, this is not what the fair use rationale on the file states; there is no discussion in the article about the image and how "infamous" it is. The reason why I removed the image is because it does not pass the first non-free content criterion, which states "Non-free content is used only where no free equivalent is available, or could be created, that would serve the same encyclopedic purpose." A free equivalent exists at File:Colgan Air Flight 3407(N200WQ) wreckage.jpg, which also shows the tail wreckage of the aircraft and serves the same encyclopedic purpose as the non-free use image. It does not matter that what it is depicting isn't as clear, a free-use alternative exists and the non-free use image cannot be included in Wikipedia based on policy. Thank you. RandomInfinity17 (talk - contributions) 03:50, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]