User talk:Whatsupguysm

Welcome!

Hi Whatsupguysm, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! Paradoctor (talk) 19:39, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Icepop (August 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ktkvtsh was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Zero sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Icepop and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ktkvtsh (talk) 16:50, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Whatsupguysm! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ktkvtsh (talk) 16:50, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Icepop

Hello, Whatsupguysm. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Icepop, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:07, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide edit summaries, especially when reverting

WP:FIES: According to the consensus policy, all edits should be explained [...] especially when reverting (undoing) the actions of other editors, as you did with this edit.

Pro tip: To avoid accidentally leaving edit summaries blank, registered editors can select "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" on the Editing tab of the[ir] user preferences.

Also, please familiarize yourself with the policies and guidelines I have linked in my edit summaries. These have community WP:consensus, and persistently violating them is a good way to get yourself blocked. We don't want that. And yes, please also read the pages linked in this post, they are kind of important for your work here. Paradoctor (talk) 23:10, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Icepop

Hello Whatsupguysm, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Icepop, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Icepop.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Frost}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Frost 09:44, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

{{Re|Frost}} Thank you for reaching out regarding the deletion discussion for Icepop. I appreciate the opportunity to clarify its significance and address any concerns.

I believe this article meets Wikipedia’s notability guidelines, as Icepop has received coverage from multiple reliable and independent sources. It is a recognized entity within its field and has made a meaningful impact, which is why I believe it deserves inclusion.

Additionally, I am open to improving the article further by adding more citations, expanding on notable aspects, and ensuring it adheres to Wikipedia’s quality standards. If there are specific areas that need work, I’d love to collaborate to enhance its credibility rather than removing it entirely.

I kindly request reconsideration and would love to hear any constructive feedback on how we can strengthen the article.

Thank you! ~~~~ Whatsupguysm (talk) 11:34, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Frost:

Thank you for reaching out regarding the deletion discussion for

Icepop

. I appreciate the opportunity to clarify its significance and address any concerns.

I believe this article meets Wikipedia’s

notability guidelines

, as

Icepop

has received coverage from multiple

reliable and independent sources

. It is a recognized entity within its field and has made a meaningful impact, which is why I believe it deserves inclusion.

Additionally, I am open to

improving the article

further by adding more citations, expanding on notable aspects, and ensuring it adheres to Wikipedia’s quality standards. If there are specific areas that need work, I’d love to collaborate to enhance its credibility rather than removing it entirely.

I kindly request reconsideration and would love to hear any constructive feedback on how we can strengthen the article.

Thank you!

~~~~

(reposted since the tag didn't work) Whatsupguysm (talk) 11:35, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Oh she right

The article Oh she right has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable song, didn't chart and artist's article up at AFD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:06, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]