User talk:Tlupick

This is Tlupick's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Liz Evans (nurse) (May 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Z1720 was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This article is very close to fulfiling the requirements of getting accepted as an article. Since this article is a WP:BLP all claims need to be cited, including that she is the cofounder of Insite. (first paragraph) Also, the last paragraph describes info about The Portland Hotel Society, which doesn't directly relate to Evans and should be removed (keep the article focused on Evans's biography). Feel free to ping me when the article is fixed and I'll review again.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Liz Evans (nurse) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Liz Evans (nurse), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Z1720 (talk) 17:54, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tlupick! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Z1720 (talk) 17:54, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Liz Evans (nurse) has been accepted

Liz Evans (nurse), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Z1720 (talk) 18:29, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Hi Tlupick! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Johann Hari several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Johann Hari, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 19:24, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Cordless Larry. Thank you for taking the time to write me about this. I'm relatively new to Wikipedia editing, and this is the first time I've had someone disagree with one of my edits. I have shared some of my concerns about Hari's page at Talk:Johann Hari, but I can be more specific, and I will try again. Thanks for your time. Tlupick (talk) 21:03, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]