User talk:Thidevall

This is Thidevall's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Climate Resilience Dialogue (March 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gheus was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please cite WP:SECONDARY sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Climate Resilience Dialogue and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gheus (talk) 14:41, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thidevall! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gheus (talk) 14:41, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Gheus!

Added secondary sources from Insurance Europe, AMICE, FERMA, EIOPA, and a leading B2B trade publication. I hope that the page can be approved:) Please make any amendments you see fit or give suggestions on improvements Thidevall (talk) 08:43, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

By secondary sources, I mean coverage in reputed newspapers and magazine. IMO, this topic is likely notable but first we have to cite 2-3 in-depth secondary sources. Gheus (talk) 07:02, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]