User talk:TheDragonFire/Archives/2025/03

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Police academies in Germany

A tag has been placed on Category:Police academies in Germany indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 12:14, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for working on the West Carroll Jr/Sr High School Page. Itisi5 (talk) 12:56, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Minor barnstar
	I award TheDragonFire this barnstar, for the minor edits made to the West Carroll Jr/Sr Highschool page. Itisi5 (talk) 14:05, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Educational publishing companies of India

A tag has been placed on Category:Educational publishing companies of India indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:50, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Things and other things film

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Things and other things film requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://variety.com/2023/film/global/riccardo-vannuccini-commedia-sequel-tarzan-global-bulletin-1235649126/ and https://deadline.com/2024/06/pier-paolo-piccioli-valentino-costume-design-things-and-other-things-greta-bellamacina-first-look-1235969906/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 18:07, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

@Fram: Since a redirect created by a page move is not a copyright violation, I will assume that you misclicked here. TheDragonFire (talk) 20:55, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Another editor had turned that redirect back into anarticle, with multiple copyvios. So for the record, you had not written any copyvio and the above message shouldn´t be held against you. Fram (talk) 05:58, 19 March 2025 (UTC)