User talk:TW929

This is TW929's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Timeline of the 2028 United States presidential election has been accepted

Timeline of the 2028 United States presidential election, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 16:13, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: RacetotheWH (February 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Epluribusunumyall were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Article needs independent and secondary sources to determine notability. -

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:RacetotheWH and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Epluribusunumyall (talk) 05:30, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TW929! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Epluribusunumyall (talk) 05:30, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cabinet

I get USAID and CFPB are not traditional cabinet posts, but 2 things are in play here - 1. Presidents can reshuffle things in the cabinet, to their own tastes and it's well established Trump does things a bit differently then the usual politician. 2. Rubio and Bessent took on extra duties after their confirmation, so all this does is reflect all of their roles. Vjmlhds (talk) 23:28, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't that mean that the acting director positions go in the Trump appointee article then? TW929 (talk) 23:30, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No reason why not. My only point here is that guys already in the cabinet added extra duties and extra titles. As I said the cabinet article is about the people more so than the specific jobs, as the president (whoever it is) can arrange things his own way. Vjmlhds (talk) 23:39, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

2026 United States Senate election in Maine

added a link pointing to Sun Journal

2026 United States Senate elections

added a link pointing to Sun Journal

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2025 Norman, Oklahoma mayoral election

The article 2025 Norman, Oklahoma mayoral election has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I’m struggling to see note that pushes this solidly above Wikipedia’s notability standards. This certainly could be covered as just a short paragraph in another article (perhaps the section on the city’s article covering its local politics). If either candidate reaches sufficient note: I can see this having a short section in an article on them.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SecretName101 (talk) 01:54, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2026 United States Senate election in Michigan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WGHN.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Race to WH

Hi, could you link to where that consensus was established, just so I have a reference point? (I don't dispute it) Thanks 331dot (talk) 15:57, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It just got archived but it should be in here Talk:2026 United States Senate elections/Archive 1 TW929 (talk) 16:06, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]