User talk:SonsofGod-Dresden

April 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Orange Mike | Talk 20:21, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mike.

Given how reasonable I was, as I did absolutely everything to be unbiased and even said so in my comment, I would like to speak to someone about your block. If you have a Wikipedia entry which is not even a little unbiased, and someone speaks the truth about the fact that the entry needs to be rewritten, and a so-called "admin" does not address the unbiased entry whatsoever but rather the person who pointed it out, then you should not be an administrator here. So please provide me with a name for someone to whom I can speak about this behavior. My comment proves my point. Absolutely nothing about my comment was hateful, bad, biased and in no way, shape or form is it even possible to take that one comment even and say what you just said. I will not rest until I speak to someone higher up than you about this behavior.

So, who can I speak to?

Thank you! SonsofGod-Dresden (talk) 21:27, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SonsofGod-Dresden (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was merely stating that an entry was biased and for that, I was blocked. I'm not here to create issues, I'm here to provide historical accuracy. SonsofGod-Dresden (talk) 21:29, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"Wikipedia isn't supposed to be administrated by the suburbs of Tel Aviv, but by unbiased people who are able to put aside their emotions". No thank you, we'll do just fine without your edits. Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:42, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the Unblock Ticket Request System that have been declined leading to the posting of this notice.

Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:43, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]