User talk:Sir Sputnik/Archive 11
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Sir Sputnik. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 |
Notice of revert for Songkran
According to my revert of Songkran and your mentioned about edit war to me.
The reason I have reverted change(s) made by User Pierrevang3 who tried to spread false information that Songkran is a Khmer word which is not true. I have some academic resources to let you know. The term Songkran is Thai word as the following proofs,
- In Google Book and search with "Songkran is a Thai word" AND "The term Songkran is a Thai word" (included Quotation marks for exact result).
And also compare search result of "Songkran is a Khmer word" and check the Phonetic notation topic in Talk:Songkran
- Doctoral Dissertation p. 334 said:- "The term Songkran is a Thai word meaning to move".
- Songkran in Oxford English Dictionary
- The term "Songkrant" (TH: สงกรานต์) in Thai language was romanized (IPA) as "songkran" in accordance with Royal Thai General System of Transcription. see Wiktionary.
I hope that you are understand the situation and proceeding under the rule Wikipedia:Don't lie to the article, and would you please remove edit war warning on my talk page if my arguments are true and correct. Thank you. Quantplinus (talk) 03:45, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – May 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2024).
Guideline and policy news
- Phase I of the 2024 requests for adminship review has concluded. Several proposals have passed outright and will proceed to implementation, including creating a discussion-only period (3b) and administrator elections (13) on a trial basis. Other successful proposals, such as creating a reminder of civility norms (2), will undergo further refinement in Phase II. Proposals passed on a trial basis will be discussed in Phase II, after their trials conclude. Further details on specific proposals can be found in the full report.
Technical news
- Partial action blocks are now in effect on the English Wikipedia. This means that administrators have the ability to restrict users from certain actions, including uploading files, moving pages and files, creating new pages, and sending thanks. T280531
Arbitration
- The arbitration case Conflict of interest management has been closed.
Miscellaneous
- This may be a good time to reach out to potential nominees to ask if they would consider an RfA.
- A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in May 2024 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles in the new pages feed. Currently, there is a backlog of over 15,000 articles awaiting review. Sign up here to participate!
- Voting for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) election is open until 9 May 2024. Read the voting page on Meta-Wiki and cast your vote here!
Draft deletion possible?
Sorry to bother you. Would you know what can be done about the draft created by the sock Bayundurid? Is deletion a possibility? --Kansas Bear (talk) 23:54, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Kansas Bear: Probably not. I'm assuming you're talking primarily about WP:G5. That's not applicable here. G5 applies to cases of block and ban evasion. Clasus1453 was not blocked from the draft namespace when they created the draft. While their edits as Bayundurid to the article and template namespaces were evasion, this draft was not. As for other potential reasons for deletion, I can't meaningfully assess those, since I know nothing about the subject. From an uninformed perspective, this looks like a reasonable, if poorly written draft, on a subject that might not be notable. Usually that's not enough to warrant deletion of draft. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:21, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ok. Thanks. --Kansas Bear (talk) 00:24, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Please link to a resolved discussion or advice that says that transfermarkt should never be regarded as reliable, as you should have done in your edit. Braintic (talk) 00:57, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Page Breaking my Computer
Hi,
As the most recent active admin, I would like to mention this:
[1], select "visual", and go to a different browser tab and come back. You'll likely see the page will start lagging. I was trying to revert vandalism and came to this. Is this vandalism? Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 20:51, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Myrealnamm: Without any particular knowledge of the subject, it looks fine to me. The lag you're experiencing is likely unrelated to this edit particular, and you'd probably get the same result for any other edit after the bulk of the page's content was added at 18:48, 22 May 2024. With over 1000 entries in the reference list, rendering the page will be quite taxing on your browser. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:12, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Regarding speedy deletion
@Sir Sputnik, I hope you're doing well. I saw you declined the speedy deletion of the sock's pages [2]. But I have talked about it with Ivanvector and they say that WP:G5 should be applied in this case. Please see the whole context here and see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mohammad Umar Ali, thanks. Based.Kashmiri (🗨️) 12:28, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Based Kashmiri: With all due respect to Ivanvector, I have to disagree with their assessment as far as G5 concerned. I will not apply that criterion unless there is some specific sanction I can point to that's being evaded, and that's not the case here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:45, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- I see. Regards. Based.Kashmiri (🗨️) 15:52, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Blocking of User:Braintic
Hi, For some time now user Braintic and I have been working together on the pre-nineties deaths lists. During this process Braintic's contributions have been instrumental in improving the quality of the lists . Sadly, I noticed you blocked User:Braintic on May 25th. Braintic was clearly out of line but the consequence is that our work has now come to a screeching halt. That's why I'm asking you to unblock Braintic. Again, you had every right to block this user who at times struggles with the rules and technology here. But it would be a shame that his/her useful contributions would come to an end. Regards, Mill 1 (talk) 10:21, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Any unblock request must come from the blocked editor themselves, and must contain a convincing explanation as to why the block is no longer necessary. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:34, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Transfermarkt
Hello Sir Sputnik,
You have removed transfermarkt.de as a source at Hamburger SV.[3] May I ask why you consider it as unreliable? I see no evidence at Transfermarkt that this is the case, especially when the website is used as a source for match results (as opposed to market values). Renerpho (talk) 10:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – June 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2024).
Administrator changes
Bureaucrat changes
Guideline and policy news
- Phase II of the 2024 RfA review has commenced to improve and refine the proposals passed in Phase I.
Technical news
- The Nuke feature, which enables administrators to mass delete pages, will now correctly delete pages which were moved to another title. T43351
Arbitration
- The arbitration case Venezuelan politics has been closed.
- The Committee is seeking volunteers for various roles, including access to the conflict of interest VRT queue.
Miscellaneous
- WikiProject Reliability's unsourced statements drive is happening in June 2024 to replace {{citation needed}} tags with references! Sign up here to participate!
Administrators' newsletter – July 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2024).
Administrator changes
Technical news
- Local administrators can now add new links to the bottom of the site Tools menu without using JavaScript. Documentation is available on MediaWiki. (T6086)
Miscellaneous
- The Community Wishlist is re-opening on 15 July 2024. Read more
Editor experience invitation
Hi Sir Sputnik :) I'm looking for experienced editors to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 17:30, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Unprotection request
Hello mate, while I was doing my daily routine on the Southern African side of NPP and AfC, I stumbled across this draft and did some minor clean ups while reviewing but it turns out this name was protected 5 years ago and requires admin access. Looking at the sources provided, I am leaning towards accept. I was wondering if you could take a look at the draft and tell me what you think. I'll be on the lookout for your response. dxneo (talk) 00:57, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Dxneo: Please consult an administrator who knows this subject area, or take the issue WP:DRV. I came across this article as evidence in a sockpuppet investigation, so seeing this draft sets off all sorts of alarm bells for me that this sockpuppetry might still be going on. However, I also know next to nothing about this subject area, and so am ill equipped to evaluate notability for myself. If another administrator or the community at large is willing to endorse the notability of the subject, I'd be happy to drop the protection. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:50, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- I'm afraid I do not know how DRV works. However, I believe Hey man im josh might help as he is very much active on NPP. dxneo (talk) 01:53, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- And if the sock is still ongoing, please eradicate the disease and put a permanent block on the IP if possible
Thank you. dxneo (talk) 01:55, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- And if the sock is still ongoing, please eradicate the disease and put a permanent block on the IP if possible
- I'm afraid I do not know how DRV works. However, I believe Hey man im josh might help as he is very much active on NPP. dxneo (talk) 01:53, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
SPI help
Hello, I've been trying to create a sockpuppet investigation page for the user "erich romel", who is vandalizing the Arslan page. I also believe he is a single-purpose account. Can you please help me? Onoghuren (talk) 10:35, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
From Detective Stranger: Regarding the recent drama
Hello @Sir Sputnik. I am @Detective Stranger.
I am sending you this reply because I wanted to clarify some things regarding the recent drama involving me. I will try to be as brief as I can while still provide as much detail for you to understand.
Firstly, this account is in no way connected to the other aforementioned account (whose username I won't mention). I am the sole owner of this account, no one else has access to it, and I do not own any other accounts on Wikipedia.
Secondly, I believe the reason this recent drama happened most likely has to do with an Edit warring I got engaged in with another user regarding the plot for the movie: Once Upon a Time in High School back in mid/late 2021 (You can find some of the conflict I had with this other user in the article's editing history, their talk page history, and my talk page history.
Here are also some other users who were involved during that time who might vouch for me: @Czar, @Schazjmd, though I doubt they remember.
Lastly, I wanted to thank you and several other users, @Mwwv, @HeartGlow30797, and @Jdcomix, also an admin @Yamla for upholding the principles and values of Wikipedia, and taking action against someone who is threatening those very principles and values.
While I may not be, as you said, active in terms of editing Wikipedia articles and such (though I am considering doing minor edits on Wikipedia like spelling and grammar checks), I am still a very active Wikipedia consumer and reader as I always loved reading and doing research on various interesting topics and Wikipedia has provided the resources for me to do that.
Looking forward to more future endeavors with you all here in Wikipedia. Detective Stranger (talk) 21:30, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
Transfermarkt again
Hello, you've removed one of citations I added because Transfermarkt is unreliable. The most recent talk about this on Wikipedia that I could find was from 11 years ago. The main reason in that talk I saw was that Transfermarkt was edited by any user. However, now an edit has to be approved by a site admin on Transfermarkt. Is there a more recent talk section about this subject? WikiEnjoyer123 (talk) 07:37, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – August 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2024).
Technical news
- Global blocks may now target accounts as well as IP's. Administrators may locally unblock when appropriate.
- Users wishing to permanently leave may now request "vanishing" via Special:GlobalVanishRequest. Processed requests will result in the user being renamed, their recovery email being removed, and their account being globally locked.
Arbitration
- The Arbitration Committee appointed the following administrators to the conflict of interest volunteer response team: Bilby, Extraordinary Writ
Removal of sourced information
Why did you make this edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2024%E2%80%9325_Legia_Warsaw_season&curid=77140480&diff=1239529470&oldid=1239513477 ?
What is so "unreliable" about the number of clean sheets given by transfermarkt? Marcelus (talk) 22:38, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
An SPI renaming
Hi Sir Sputnik, How are you doing? I recently filed an SPI recently. Since then the user has been renamed. I am wondering whether the SPI should be renamed accordingly? I guess it would be good if I let an SPI clerk, someone like you, do the moving? Chanaka L (talk) 08:41, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2024).
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, there is a new criterion for speedy deletion: C4, which
applies to unused maintenance categories, such as empty dated maintenance categories for dates in the past
. - A request for comment is open to discuss whether Notability (species) should be adopted as a subject-specific notability guideline.
Arbitration
- Following a motion, remedies 5.1 and 5.2 of World War II and the history of Jews in Poland (the topic and interaction bans on My very best wishes, respectively) were repealed.
- Remedy 3C of the German war effort case ("Cinderella157 German history topic ban") was suspended for a period of six months.
- The arbitration case Historical Elections is currently open. Proposed decision is expected by 3 September 2024 for this case.
Miscellaneous
- Editors can now enter into good article review circles, an alternative for informal quid pro quo arrangements, to have a GAN reviewed in return for reviewing a different editor's nomination.
- A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in September 2024 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles and redirects in the new pages feed. Currently, there is a backlog of over 13,900 articles and 26,200 redirects awaiting review. Sign up here to participate!
Regarding Molde FK in European football
I noticed your message on my talk page regarding my revert of your edit. I agree with your message, but would like to note that I only attempted to improve the Wiki by updating outdated statistics. The statistics regarding Berg Hestad already existed without referencing and I added a reference. I don't consider Transfermarkt a reliable source but thought it would suffice given the dearth of other sources. Thank you for writing a message to me on my own talk page and I hope I didn't offend you by my revert, which I now accept was wrong. The Voivodeship King (talk) 06:47, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Transfermarkt
Hi there,
I’m still fairly new to this so I have a question. You reverted links to individual historical game results on Transfermarkt from an article I edited. I notice this seems to be a common question on here, and I don’t see the answer, but is there a reason it isn’t considered reliable? And also, I intend to go through and edit quite a few other pages in this series which have match results on them (created by someone else but currently more or less stubs). The match results list on the pages is super useful - giving a lot of the utility of the page, so I don’t want to delete them. Is it better to just leave the match results unsourced, or do you know of a more reliable site for match results that I could use as the source instead?
thanks for your help. Absurdum4242 (talk) 02:17, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
A big problem again
Hello @Sir Sputnik, and thank you for your action against vandals, especially those with some Romanian football players. But the vandal is back again and again, now he is called Finngamer21, just look at Alex Stan and Dragoș Albu, besides that the edits are incomplete, he start insulting again. Thank you DNT (talk) 20:10, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Sir Sputnik, where did Finngamer21 make legal threats? Robby.is.on (talk) 20:26, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Robby.is.on: While editing anonymously before registering their account here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:27, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, okay. Thanks. Robby.is.on (talk) 20:31, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Sir Sputnik and @Robby.is.on, sorry for bothering you again, but the vandal is back again, again he insult others, just take a look at Octavian Popescu page and Omar El Sawy, but he is editing on multiple ip like 5.14.128.113 or 2A02:A58:82B0:F600:F4B6:5A0D:9D5C:9951 or 2A02:2F05:1211:1300:24A2:222F:9A50:9D85. So is a chance to prevent this kind of thing, because he is very rude and destroy others work. Thank you and have a good day. DNT (talk) 06:11, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- For "for urgent incidents or chronic, intractable behavioral problems" write a report at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Robby.is.on (talk) 11:02, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Robby.is.onHe change the ip on several times, so how can I report him ?Thank you DNT (talk) 17:12, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Given that the person behind all of this is blocked, any edits they make may be reverted per WP:BLOCKREVERT and without regard to the 3-revert rule. If they're particularly targeting a certain page, you can make a request for page protection at WP:RPP. They're sticking to the same IP or their edit summaries cross the line from just insults to grossly offensive, report them to WP:AIV. Those two cases aside, your best bet is to just revert and ignore them. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:25, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you @Sir Sputnik for your advice. DNT (talk) 21:41, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Given that the person behind all of this is blocked, any edits they make may be reverted per WP:BLOCKREVERT and without regard to the 3-revert rule. If they're particularly targeting a certain page, you can make a request for page protection at WP:RPP. They're sticking to the same IP or their edit summaries cross the line from just insults to grossly offensive, report them to WP:AIV. Those two cases aside, your best bet is to just revert and ignore them. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:25, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Robby.is.onHe change the ip on several times, so how can I report him ?Thank you DNT (talk) 17:12, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- For "for urgent incidents or chronic, intractable behavioral problems" write a report at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Robby.is.on (talk) 11:02, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Sir Sputnik and @Robby.is.on, sorry for bothering you again, but the vandal is back again, again he insult others, just take a look at Octavian Popescu page and Omar El Sawy, but he is editing on multiple ip like 5.14.128.113 or 2A02:A58:82B0:F600:F4B6:5A0D:9D5C:9951 or 2A02:2F05:1211:1300:24A2:222F:9A50:9D85. So is a chance to prevent this kind of thing, because he is very rude and destroy others work. Thank you and have a good day. DNT (talk) 06:11, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, okay. Thanks. Robby.is.on (talk) 20:31, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Robby.is.on: While editing anonymously before registering their account here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:27, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – October 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2024).
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Guideline and policy news
- Administrator elections are a proposed new process for selecting administrators, offering an alternative to requests for adminship (RfA). The first trial election will take place in October 2024, with candidate sign-up from October 8 to 14, a discussion phase from October 22 to 24, and SecurePoll voting from October 25 to 31. For questions or to help out, please visit the talk page at Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections.
- Following a discussion, the speedy deletion reason "File pages without a corresponding file" has been moved from criterion G8 to F2. This does not change what can be speedily deleted.
- A request for comment is open to discuss whether there is a consensus to have an administrator recall process.
Arbitration
- The arbitration case Historical elections has been closed.
- An arbitration case regarding Backlash to diversity and inclusion has been opened.
- Editors are invited to nominate themselves to serve on the 2024 Arbitration Committee Electoral Commission until 23:59 October 8, 2024 (UTC).
Miscellaneous
- If you are interested in stopping spammers, please put MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist and MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist on your watchlist, and help out when you can.
Please help to lock a page
Hi,
Here, I need to go straight to point about this matter.So I found out that you helped restored a revision of this page: 2003 Phnom Penh riots from a vandalized edit by an anonymous contributor which took place in June. And the thing is Today I have noticed that the same vandalized edit occurred again, with an exact context like the last time, and it was likely the doing of the same person just with a different IP address this time round. Though I’m yet to create a proper Wikipedia account myself as a contributor, , I do tried to restored the page back to before this latest vandalism, however in this case, I would like to ask if you could help with locking the page for a period of time, since you are part of the Wikipedia administration and used to do us a favor by restoring the page to where the context were properly sourced and confirmed for their reliability.
I hope you can take my request into the consideration. Thanks. 36.37.219.63 (talk) 11:37, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Happy Adminship Anniversary!
|
|
Wishing Sir Sputnik a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 00:58, 21 October 2024 (UTC) |
Happy Adminship Anniversary!
| Happy adminship anniversary! Hi Sir Sputnik! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of your successful request for adminship. Enjoy this special day! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 08:15, 21 October 2024 (UTC) |  |
Invitation to participate in a research
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Phạm Văn Rạng
Hi, I have noticed that after you revert the edits of one of their socks, there is an often an IP that restores the edits, for example on the articles Sovereign state, Succession of states, and Russian nationalism. Mellk (talk) 19:39, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Mellk: Thanks for the heads up. If it becomes a recurring problem on any given article, your best bet is to report to WP:RPP. Page protection tends to be a more effective tool for dealing with WP:LOUTSOCKing. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:23, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, I will try requesting page protection in future. Mellk (talk) 04:23, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Six years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:38, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Hey mate, I don't know wikipedia at all. I just wanted to start talking about assistant managers in football, and give poeple their flowers. I started talking about one I love because I am a huge Liverpool fan and he helped us a lot in 2005, so he was the first one I wanted to talk about, and improve his wikipedia. But after the talk page about me in WikiFootball or whatever and the constant harrassment and reverting I just want to leave and not come back. Can that talk discussion mentioning me be deleted please? It's giving me anxiety I just want to leave thanks. I won't do any more edits. I just wanted to contribute to the community sorry — Preceding unsigned comment added by Glaivebladee (talk • contribs) 20:15, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – November 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2024).
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Oversighter changes
Guideline and policy news
- Following a discussion, the discussion-only period proposal that went for a trial to refine the requests for adminship (RfA) process has been discontinued.
- Following a request for comment, Administrator recall is adopted as a policy.
Technical news
- Mass deletions done with the Nuke tool now have the 'Nuke' tag. This change will make reviewing and analyzing deletions performed with the tool easier. T366068
Arbitration
- RoySmith, Barkeep49 and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2024 Arbitration Committee Elections. ThadeusOfNazereth and Dr vulpes are reserve commissioners.
- Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate from 3 November 2024 until 12 November 2024 to stand in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections.
- The Arbitration Committee is seeking volunteers for roles such as clerks, access to the COI queue, checkuser, and oversight.
Miscellaneous
- An unreferenced articles backlog drive is happening in November 2024 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. Sign up to participate!
Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research
Hello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.
Take the survey here.
Kind Regards,