User talk:Sebbog13
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]
- Hi Sebbog13! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 18:37, Sunday, June 25, 2023 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Norwegian election
[edit]Thanks for removing the pointless "list in Wikidata" description for February–August 1814 Norwegian Constituent Assembly election—it was a body formed specifically to draw up the constitution of Norway, and the delegates are still known as eidsvollmennene ("the Eidsvoll men"), so the election was a significant historical event. I've added a description that hopefully makes that more obvious. Not a particularly short one, though.
That said, I think {{Short description|none}} is absolutely correct for a lot of the election articles, and it's certainly better than List on Wikidata.
Anyway, I wanted to explain my perhaps abrupt edit in response to yours popping up in my watchlist. Musiconeologist (talk) 19:20, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Addendum: I see you're from Norway . . . In that case, feel free to correct my description if it needs it! Beklager. Musiconeologist (talk) 19:23, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Musiconeologist: The reason I set the short description to "none", is because the title of the article, February–August 1814 Norwegian Constituent Assembly election, says the exact months and year, that the election is Norwegian, that it's a "Constituent Assembly" election and the word "election". Not sure if it requires a short description or not. - Sebbog13 (talk) 19:34, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- That makes sense. My logic was: as a non-Norwegian, I assumed "Constituent Assembly" was just an old name for the parliament until I read the article and the NAOB entry for eidsvollsmann. Anyway I'm not bothered either way—I just didn't like changing the edit so abruptly without explaining myself, and it seemed polite to say. Musiconeologist (talk) 20:04, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Musiconeologist: The reason I set the short description to "none", is because the title of the article, February–August 1814 Norwegian Constituent Assembly election, says the exact months and year, that the election is Norwegian, that it's a "Constituent Assembly" election and the word "election". Not sure if it requires a short description or not. - Sebbog13 (talk) 19:34, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:David Szymanski
[edit]
Hello, Sebbog13. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "David Szymanski".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:39, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer granted
[edit]
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit
charlotte 👸♥ 00:06, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Queen of Hearts: Woah, what did I do to earn this? Thanks! - Sebbog13 (talk) 00:13, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Upcoming expiry of your patroller right
[edit]Hi, this is an automated reminder as part of Global reminder bot to let you know that your permission "patroller" (New page reviewers) will expire on 23:54, 27 February 2025 (UTC). For most rights, you will need to renew at WP:PERM, unless you have been told otherwise when your right was approved. To opt out of user right expiry notifications, add yourself to m:Global reminder bot/Exclusion. Leaderbot (talk) 19:42, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
New page reviewer granted
[edit]
Hi Sebbog13, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.
This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:
- Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
- If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
- If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies
You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! Sohom (talk) 13:39, 29 March 2025 (UTC)