User talk:Sadko

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, linking to me ({{Ping|Sadko}}), so that I will be notified.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, linking to your username, so that you will be notified.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.

Archives

Index

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4	Archive 5	Archive 6

Request translate article Isabelle de Charrière (Q123386)

Hello Sadko, Would you like to translate/create the article about Isabelle de Charrière (Q123386) for the SR Wikipedia? Portraits of her are made by Maurice Quentin de la Tour in 1766 and 1771. Boss-well63 (talk) 23:53, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not right now, but thank you for reaching out. You might want to try posting your request here. — Sadko (words are wind) 01:33, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Page Aleksa Đukanović

Draft:Aleksa Đukanović

Could one of the editors publish this draft as a regular article?

Vogoje (talk) 15:30, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You need to add more references (Biography). — Sadko (words are wind) 16:02, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. This is the original article. (https://sr.wikipedia.org/sr-ec/%D0%90%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%81%D0%B0_%D0%82%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%9B) Can you supplement it from here and publish it on English Wikipedia?

@Sadko, jesi li ti "naš" Sadko, sa srpske vikipedije? Vogoje (talk) 18:40, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, please use English, as this is EWP. I kindly encourage you to complete your own work, but if you need any additional assistance, feel free to reach out to me. — Sadko (words are wind) 00:30, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Sadko Ok, no problem.The text page in Serbian is identical to the one in English. I don't know what else to add. Can you insert what you think is missing and post it on ENG Wikipedia? Vogoje (talk) 21:28, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Each project has its own standards and requirements. As I mentioned, you need to add more WP:RS. — Sadko (words are wind) 21:38, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What else? Source? More personal biographies? Vogoje (talk) 21:51, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles, reviews, books and so on, take your pick. Please read WP:RS. — Sadko (words are wind) 21:55, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OK Vogoje (talk) 22:03, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Sadko Look now, I've completed it. Is it enough?Draft:Aleksa Đukanović Vogoje (talk) 22:19, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Critical reception (selection) needs to be removed. It looks somewhat better. — Sadko (words are wind) 01:10, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OK, removed. Can you publish the page now? Vogoje (talk) 01:22, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You should go ahead and publish the article. I'm unsure about EWP local rules or guidelines regarding direct requests for publishing a draft like this one. — Sadko (words are wind) 01:24, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How do I publish it? I don't know. I am not an editor or an administrator. I don't see an option for that. That's why I asked you if you could help me with the publication? Vogoje (talk) 01:26, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We're all editors. Please see Wikipedia:Articles for creation. — Sadko (words are wind) 01:49, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Sadko

Yes, I found it now. I just posted. Thank you very much.

I hope no one deletes the article from the editor. Greetings! Vogoje (talk) 01:52, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure. Best. — Sadko (words are wind) 10:17, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Insurgency in Kosovo

Hello! Recently in the insurgency in Kosovo article you removed my edit in the result parameter which stated that the KLA captured most of Drenica because it didnt belong in the result parameter. I apologize for my mistake however i have a question? Can the KLA capturing Drenica be added in the "territorial changes" parameter on the infobox? Peja mapping (talk) 11:46, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I suppose so. However, I wouldn’t go that route, as including that information would require listing all other changes, potentially sparking new edit conflicts. It’s simpler to incorporate it within the text; just my two cents. Best. — Sadko (words are wind) 11:50, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks for your advise. Btw i was reading Template:Infobox military conflict and the result parameter stated that its not appropriate to add multiple results or say "tactical victory but strategic defeat", so would it be better if a "See aftermath" result was added isntead and most of the things in the result section to be moved to the aftermath section. Peja mapping (talk) 14:07, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Take care. — Sadko (words are wind) 18:18, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok but should a "See aftermath" result be added. I already made an aftermath section on the article which would suit being added into the result parameter. It also states on Template:Infobox military conflict that adding a "See aftermath" result should be used in situations like this.Peja mapping (talk)

Try using the TP first and see what the other editors think. I'm confident we'll find a solution we can all agree on. — Sadko (words are wind) 14:15, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]