User talk:SEPB66

Welcome!

Hello, SEPB66, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as West-Flanders Mapping, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Paradoctor (talk) 13:19, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of West-Flanders Mapping

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on West-Flanders Mapping requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Paradoctor (talk) 13:19, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

why? SEPB66 (talk) 13:26, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Second sentence of the nomination above: This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant. Please click the links and read the content there. Paradoctor (talk) 13:48, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by image adding

Hello, I see that you have added a lot of different flags, coat of arms, etc. to Belgium-related articles. These can be useful but please read MOS:IMAGERELEVANCE and think first whether adding them benefits the reader. In most cases, we have access to large numbers of relevant images and we are not able to use everything in an article. Some of these seem rather questionable and I'm also concerned that some of the images themselves have dubious historical provenance and may be later inventions. Please read WP:V and cite sources supporting your designs to clear this up. Thanks! —Brigade Piron (talk) 16:03, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Flag and Coat of arms of West -Flanders moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Flag and Coat of arms of West -Flanders. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 12:23, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Flags

Please don't (re)add flags without making very sure that they are correct. E.g. this, as far as I can tell Ruanda-Urundi didn't have an official flag, and I have seen no evidence that this one was in use at all. In other lists, please only insert flags which are verifiable (so not sourced to Wikipedia, Flags of the World, or other random websites) and of some importance (as there are countless organisations with their own flag which is of no importance otherwise). Fram (talk) 08:37, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Belgian heraldry, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Brabant, Limburg and Hainaut. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong move

This is not a "move to mainspace", please don't use incorrect edit summaries. Furthermore, this is incorrect capitalization, the coat of arms of West Flanders is not a proper noun but a description. All our pages on coats of arms start with "Coat of arms", not "Coat of Arms"[1]. All our articles on "flag and coat of arms" have the lowercase[2]. I'll move it back, please don't move it again. Fram (talk) 08:19, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

Please stop. If you continue to remove maintenance templates without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Leo Belgicus (heraldry), you may be blocked from editing. CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:59, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Provincial Mausoleum of Political Prisoners and Deportees, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Authorities.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Provincial Mausoleum of Political Prisoners and Deportees moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Provincial Mausoleum of Political Prisoners and Deportees. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Vegantics (talk) 16:57, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Provincial Mausoleum of Political Prisoners and Deportees has been accepted

Provincial Mausoleum of Political Prisoners and Deportees, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 00:27, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]