User talk:Rodrigoruiz1988

Welcome!

Hello, Rodrigoruiz1988, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Juan Ruiz Naupari, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Electricmemory (talk) 18:11, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article doesn’t seem to fit the G11 criteria for immediate deletion, as the G11 description literally say “ Any article that describes its subject from a neutral point of view does not qualify for this criterion”, and the article seems to be written in a neutral point of view. Do you have any specific examples of information not being presented from a neutral point of view that we could revise? 187.189.50.171 (talk) 21:03, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Juan Ruiz Naupari

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Juan Ruiz Naupari, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Electricmemory (talk) 18:11, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Juan Ruiz Naupari (February 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Taabii was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Juan Ruiz Naupari and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Taabii (talk) 18:43, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rodrigoruiz1988! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Taabii (talk) 18:43, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking the time to reply Taabi. The article doesn’t seem to fit the G11 criteria for immediate deletion, as the G11 description literally say “ Any article that describes its subject from a neutral point of view does not qualify for this criterion”, and the article seems to be written in a neutral point of view. Do you have any specific examples of information not being presented from a neutral point of view that we could revise? I’ll make sure to check out the Teahouse page I have visited read the guidelines numerous times and careful but I’m still not sure why this is being specifically flagged for immediate deletion under G11. 187.189.50.171 (talk) 21:04, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Rodrigoruiz1988! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Any ideas about why this article draft would be flagged?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:27, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]