User talk:PharyngealImplosive7/Archive 4
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions with User:PharyngealImplosive7. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
EFFPR
Hi, I believe Special:Diff/1276093338 was made in good faith. See [1]. It seems to me that it just happened that the newest awardee's name was Lol. Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 21:13, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- However I cannot be sure if it is factual or not. I think the user needs to provide RSes. Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 21:26, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Yeah anyways, it would be
, so it doesn't make much difference since the edit wouldn't be implemented either. – PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 23:49, 16 February 2025 (UTC)Consider requesting on the article's talk page; please provide the necessary references.
- Well, not really. It was definitely a constructive edit, if they used
{{Edit request}}
then it would've probably been seen by someone else. I've implemented the edit for them, but next time, I believe that requests like those should stay, and the filter may need to be changed, so I've added another request at WP:EFFPR. Thanks, Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 13:23, 17 February 2025 (UTC)- Thanks for taking the time to look for potentially constructive edits - I never would have realized this edit was constructive without your help. As for changing the filter, I don't think there is much we can do. – PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 23:01, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- Well, not really. It was definitely a constructive edit, if they used
- Yeah anyways, it would be
Feedback request: Language and linguistics request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Template talk:IPA pulmonic consonants on a "Language and linguistics" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:30, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – March 2025
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2025).

- A request for comment is open to discuss whether AI-generated images (meaning those wholly created by generative AI, not human-created images modified with AI tools) should be banned from use in articles.
- A series of 22 mini-RFCs that double-checked consensus on some aspects and improved certain parts of the administrator elections process has been closed (see the summary of the changes).
- A request for comment is open to gain consensus on whether future administrator elections should be held.
- A new filter has been added to the Special:Nuke tool, which allows administrators to filter for pages in a range of page sizes (in bytes). This allows, for example, deleting pages only of a certain size or below. T378488
- Non-administrators can now check which pages are able to be deleted using the Special:Nuke tool. T376378
- The 2025 appointees for the Ombuds commission are だ*ぜ, Arcticocean, Ameisenigel, Emufarmers, Faendalimas, Galahad, Nehaoua, Renvoy, Revi C., RoySmith, Teles and Zafer as members, with Vermont serving as steward-observer.
- Following the 2025 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: 1234qwer1234qwer4, AramilFeraxa, Daniuu, KonstantinaG07, MdsShakil and XXBlackburnXx.
New message from Someone who's wrong on the internet
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Edit filter/Requested § Date format changes. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 15:01, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
WP:EFFP
Could I ask you about this edit? Are you sure? PhilKnight (talk) 19:04, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Upon further investigation, not really: it could be good faith? I've re-added the report and ask them to provide a source for their claim, just in case. Thanks for catching that for me. – PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 19:09, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks, I am not too sure either. I initially reverted their edits, but self-reverted. PhilKnight (talk) 19:18, 22 March 2025 (UTC)