Jump to content

User talk:Owais Al Qarni

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your contributions

[edit]

Assalam alaikum hafiz sahab. Your immense contributions on wikipedia for islamic personality is great.May Allah reward you for this in hereafter. Keep it up. Khalidwarrior (talk) 21:17, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bangladesh Barnstar

[edit]
Bangladesh Barnstar
Thank you for your efforts and contributions to Bangladesh-related articles. Keep up the good work. All the best! TheEagle107 (talk) 19:51, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Islamic Barnstar
For your contributions to Islam-related articles on Wikipedia! SalamAlayka (talk) 18:23, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks

[edit]

Your recent article on Deobandi fiqh is a really good addition to the encyclopedia. Many editors are reluctant to write such ambitious and wide-ranging topics but I think you’ve done an outstanding job! All the best

Mccapra (talk) 12:46, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

+1. Brilliant job! ─ The Aafī (talk) 13:42, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Fix some citation issues and nominate a good fact for DYK! ─ The Aafī (talk) 13:47, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
Assalamo Alekum. Keep up your contribution to Islamic-related articles. From Ainty Painty (talk) 17:42, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Islamic Barnstar
Have nothing but respect for your untiring efforts and contributions to Islam-related articles on Wikipedia! Your work speaks for itself and is a source of inspiration for many!!!...Ngrewal1 (talk) 18:14, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Al-Wafa bi Asma al-Nisa

[edit]

On 14 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Al-Wafa bi Asma al-Nisa, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Akram Nadwi addressed the lack of Islamic women scholars highlighted in a Time article by composing al-Wafa bi Asma al-Nisa, a 43-volume work with more than 10,000 entries? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Al-Wafa bi Asma al-Nisa. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Al-Wafa bi Asma al-Nisa), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Schwede66 00:02, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Media Bias/Fact Check

[edit]

Hi, I noticed that you added citations to Media Bias/Fact Check to several articles. Please note that it is not considered a reliable source to cite; see WP:MBFC. Isi96 (talk) 03:49, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed them all. Please be far more careful, and refer to WP:RSP and WP:RSN if there's any doubt if a source might be reliable. --Hipal (talk) 21:45, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please be more careful with BLP content

[edit]

Information icon You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Hipal (talk) 16:05, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Hipal. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.[1] --Hipal (talk) 18:25, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you.[2] --Hipal (talk) 14:35, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Ishaq Faridi.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Ishaq Faridi.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:30, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Poor and unreliable sources

[edit]

It appears that you are continuing to use poor or unreliable sources in your editing. I strongly suggest you cleanup the articles you've already worked on rather than moving to other articles and creating the same or similar problems. You've been pointed to WP:RS, WP:RSP, and WP:RSN. Please take some time to review WP:RS further. --Hipal (talk) 23:31, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Deobandi Quranic studies has been nominated for merging

[edit]

Category:Deobandi Quranic studies has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:28, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Deobandi institutions has been nominated for merging

[edit]

Category:Deobandi institutions has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:55, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]