User talk:Neoogai

Welcome!

Hi Neoogai! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! - Adolphus79 (talk) 02:46, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

Hello, I'm Adolphus79. An edit that you recently made to Talk:Donald Trump seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! - Adolphus79 (talk) 02:46, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Talk:Michael Jackson, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember that Wikipedia is a widely used reference tool, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use your sandbox instead. Thank you. GSK (talk • edits) 03:49, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Blackface, you may be blocked from editing. -REDACTED403 (talk) 01:28, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Elon Musk. Your subtle vandalism may have gone unnoticed by other editors, but not by me. Please edit productively. GSK (talk • edits) 14:16, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Otto von Baeyer moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Otto von Baeyer, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 11:46, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Otto Groth moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Otto Groth. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:43, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fritz Gablonsky moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Fritz Gablonsky. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:43, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Undraftifying unsourced articles

Please do not undraftify an article that has 0 sources. It was moved from mainspace because it isn't suitable there. Repeatedly publishing unsourced articles is disruptive and inappropriate, and will likely get you blocked. Please stop. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:44, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mr Burns

Hi. I noticed you changed Mr. Burns age. It was great that you used an edit summary, but it didn't explain why you thought 139 was better than the range that was there before. Why do you think it is an improvement?-- Jahalive (talk) 17:32, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An Link Said that Mr Burns Age Was 139 since he was born in 1886. Neoogai (talk) 17:45, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There were links that said something else, that you removed. When you make a change like that, you should include your link in an inline citation. You can read how to do that here: Help:Referencing for beginners.-- Jahalive (talk) 18:52, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you do the math 2025-1886=139 Neoogai (talk) 18:55, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

https://screenrant.com/simpsons-show-mr-burns-age-old-changes-explained/#:~:text=Real%20Age%20Explained-,Mr.,%2C%20except%20it%20isn't. Neoogai (talk) 18:55, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That article says a bunch of different things about his age in different episodes. You can add that citation if you want but I think the age should go back to the way it was.-- Jahalive (talk) 19:05, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Michael Bates (Sealand), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 21:51, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Bates_(Sealand) saiys he was born on that date, and born in that city. Neoogai (talk) 21:57, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's obviously not a reliable source, which you would know if you'd bothered to look at the link I provided. DrKay (talk) 06:51, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Olo (Colour) (April 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Olo (Colour) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:06, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Neoogai! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:06, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. At least one of your edits on the page Henry Ford, while it may have been in good faith, was difficult to distinguish from vandalism. To help other editors understand the reason for the changes, you can use an edit summary for your contributions. You can also take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. I appreciate your editing efforts, however the article already goes into great detail on his antisemitic beliefs and practices and is well sourced as well.— TheTransitFanNY^{Talk Page _{(If you dare lol)}} 03:06, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I may thank you mate, I didn’t know, Toodle do! Neoogai (talk) 03:27, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Francisco Franco Salgado-Araújo moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Francisco Franco Salgado-Araújo. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 11:18, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Archie Mountbatten-Winsdor (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Archie Mountbatten-Winsdor (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is:

a disambiguation page with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" which lists only one extant Wikipedia page (i.e., there is a primary topic);
a disambiguation page that lists zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" whose target is neither a disambiguation page nor page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 14:19, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Arturo Álvarez-Buylla Godino moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Arturo Álvarez-Buylla Godino. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:01, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yoris, why are you monitoring on me, this is why I will use the Moscow rules in the future mate Neoogai (talk) 23:05, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Hello, I'm Frost. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, John Shedletsky, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Frost 14:40, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Francisco Franco Salgado-Araújo (June 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HilssaMansen19 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The subject may be notable but more work is required before accepting it. Some sources inculded are links to only the Wikipedia articles of people and no information other than page numbers assuming of books written by them. A rewriting per formal tone is required.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Francisco Franco Salgado-Araújo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

HilssaMansen19Irien1291S • spreading wiki love ~ Message here; no calls 22:49, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Melania Trump. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please read MOS:GEOLINK and MOS:OVERLINK before making further edits. Thanks. Thedarkknightli (talk) 18:16, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Luis León

The article Luis León has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article has no reliable citation and it still needs to be improved

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 16:29, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Otto Groth

Hello, Neoogai. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Otto Groth, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:07, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Fritz Gablonsky

Hello, Neoogai. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fritz Gablonsky, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fritz Gablonsky (August 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GraziePrego was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fritz Gablonsky and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GraziePrego (talk) 03:31, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]