This is an archive of past discussions with User:Mabdul. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Hi! Der Vollständigkeit halber: Du hast schon recht, dass Pellow Mathematikstudentin war. Das aber nicht am CERN, sondern an ihrer Heimat-Uni in England. Ich wollte das eben schon reinschreiben, habe dann aber gemerkt, dass das den Rahmen sprengt - das ist ja nicht der Bio-Artikel über Nicola Pellow... In der englischen WP gibt's ihn, vielleicht sollte man ihn ja in der deutschen anlegen; wobei ich unsicher bin, ob er die Relevanzhürde packen würde. --Raphael Kirchner (talk) 18:03, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Hello, Mabdul. You have new messages at Talk:HyperCard. Message added 15:14, 18 August 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
THX for the copy edit. Really good, since in a few days the GAN reviewer will start (since it is the second oldest article at the moment!). I'm not allowed to look the ticket. How to look at this? mabdul15:10, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Hello, Mabdul. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Help desk. Message added 00:55, 10 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
I didn't changed anything. But as you said: if the reference is a blog than it mighty be reverted/removed since it doesn't passed as a reliable source.
Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob (talk) 23:40, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
mmh I'm really busy at the moemnt (maybe you recognized it already). I will nominate the article - normally we have to wait one or two months... Don't you think we need another look at the times? (is/was the browser is actually halted...) mabdul19:36, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
That might be something needed for featured article, but the way it's written, it will probably make it as a GA. --Gyrobo (talk) 20:00, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Note in particular that you are not permitted to use this newly-granted right to edit Wikipedia via anonymous proxies, or disruptively. If you do, or there is a serious concern of abuse, then the right may be removed by any administrator.
Appropriate usage and compliance with the policy may be checked periodically, due to the nature of block exemption, and block exemption will be removed when no longer needed (for example, when the block it is related to expires).
Development stopped because I had to do a Ph.D. in astrophysics. :-) :-) Also because I was in Texas, I didn't have either the access to capital that netscape did. At one point I did have an interesting conversation with Richard Stallman (who tried to convince me to stop doing astrophysics). and later I did talk to a lawyer from Microsoft, which was another interesting experience.
It is interesting because I was involved in tkWWW as part of an effort to develop better tools for scientific visualization and physics education, and now even in 2010, the tools aren't very good, and there has been very little progression is educational courseware since 1991.
I don't remember releasing a 0.17 and a quick google doesn't show anything from that. I'll take a look at some ancient backups to see if I can find anything. Roadrunner (talk) 16:06, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
Unfortunately, I don't know of anything published that would make it onto the article. I *do* know of some interesting facts that aren't in the article, but I don't know how to incorporate this into the article.
you might be right, but as long I have no time and lust to create already another article I thought it would be better to have at least any notice/redirect what this product was than nothing. mabdul16:44, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
It's usually best to create a stub over a redirect as there are other editors (including anonymous ones) who will expand the article over time. You may also be interested to know that air mosaic was at one point popular for its "hotlists" feature.Smallman12q (talk) 18:06, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
Hey, I was just looking over the list of members on the Podcasting group and wanted to see if you were still active in the project. If so, it looks like the project could use a little jump-start. In particular, I think notability requirements and assessment guidelines could be added/updated. Please check out the page if you're still interested and move your name to the 2011 active list. Thanks! Udeezy (talk) 23:11, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GreenBrowser until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Pnm (talk) 23:51, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
magazine request
Hi,
I'm afraid I can't help you with the request for Computer Magazine. I think it's a "popular magazine" and not a scientific one, so my university does not have access. Good luck finding it! -- Sander (talk) 13:03, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The author of this article contested the PROD—an action which you reverted. According to WP:DEPROD, the author's action was permitted and the PROD should not be reinstated. If you still believe that the article should be deleted, you should take it to AfD. Favonian (talk) 13:14, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Hello, Mabdul. I see a lot of dead links in Adobe Integrated Runtime's External Links section. (All links in Security sub-section seem dead to me.) However, before I go ahead and delete them, would you please take a look at them too? Maybe they are experiencing a temporary down time or whatever. I thought a double-check is better than nothing. Thanks in advance. Fleet Command (talk) 22:36, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
This is just to let you know I've removed your "* Comment" in the "PC reduces vandalism, but so does semi-protection" section of this page (as it violates the stated conventions of that page, which are pretty much being followed). If you want to have your comment read and discussed, apparently it should go on the associated talk page. -R. S. Shaw (talk) 03:17, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Favicon at DYK
I determined at T:TDYK that the article Favicon was not appropriate to DYK. I based my decision on the rules found at Wikipedia:Did_you_know#DYK_rules, where it describes the requirement for a 5x expansion and a "new" time frame. The fairly slow expansion of favicon over the past year does not qualify. Binksternet (talk) 19:34, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
revert clarification
I noticed your revert of my edit at Hooker, I changed it because I generally see names unstylized, but I admit I'm not sure on the policy regarding sylization. Also, I don't really understand your edit summary in reference to the change. If you could provide some clarification I would appreciate it. Thanks Monty84521:58, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
Oh I noticed that I (or twinkle) reverted not all changes that I wanted to. The "problem" was - as statet correctly in the edit summary - that there should be only one wikilink per entry on a disambiguation page.As statet at Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages)#Individual entries:
Each entry should have exactly one navigable (blue) link to efficiently guide readers to the most relevant article for that use of the ambiguous term. Do not wikilink any other words in the line.
Done
please see Wikipedia:Help desk#SVG-thumbnail preview broken mabdul 20:29, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
