User talk:Lookhereindia

Welcome!

Hello, Lookhereindia, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Girlfriend Khali Hai Kya, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! DGG ( talk ) 23:02, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Girlfriend Khali Hai Kya

The article Girlfriend Khali Hai Kya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No third party evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 23:02, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ho Halla

Hello, Lookhereindia. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Ho Halla, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Domdeparis (talk) 05:08, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Payal Dev

Hello, Lookhereindia. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Payal Dev, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Domdeparis (talk) 05:40, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hribom for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hribom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hribom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Celestina007 (talk) 19:51, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sahil Mishra

The article Sahil Mishra has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to meet WP:NACTOR

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Singularity42 (talk) 18:04, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Devrishi (April 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Taabii was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Devrishi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Taabii (talk) 17:35, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I’ve added 3 new reliable sources including national media, and cleaned the tone as per past suggestions. Kindly review. Lookhereindia (talk) 23:57, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lookhereindia! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Taabii (talk) 17:35, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

== Reply to reviewer ==

Thank you @Taabii for reviewing the draft.

I appreciate your time and feedback. I understand the concerns regarding the notability and the importance of using reliable, independent sources. I am currently working on gathering more substantial references that meet Wikipedia's standards.

I have also added a disclosure regarding my association with the subject as per the COI guidelines. I will reach out to the AfC Help Desk or the Teahouse if I need further help in improving the draft.

Warm regards,

Lookhereindia (representing Devrishi) Lookhereindia (talk) 18:10, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I’ve added 3 new reliable sources including national media, and cleaned the tone as per past suggestions. Kindly review. Lookhereindia (talk) 10:13, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional sources

You have used sources that are either clearly noted as paid placement, unmarked press releases or marketing content, or blatant fake content farms which house unmarked SEO placement. One of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. These sources step far beyond those policies. Please carefully evaluate your references in the future, and ensure that you are in compliance with our mandatory paid editing disclosures. Sam Kuru (talk) 17:52, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am associated with the subject of this article (Devrishi), and I am editing this draft to improve its neutrality and verifiability using independent, reliable sources. Lookhereindia (talk) 18:08, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

foxstoryindia.com: Linksearch en - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • MER-C Cross-wiki • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced • COIBot-Local - COIBot-XWiki - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.org • Live link: http://spam.foxstoryindia.com